10. Ordinance approving a three-year special use permit for a personal instruction, general use for Shoot 360 located at 17255 College Boulevard in the BP-2, Planned Manufacturing District

[10. Ordinance approving a three-year special use permit for a personal instruction, general use for Shoot 360 located at 17255 College Boulevard in the BP-2, Planned Manufacturing District]

NUMBER TEN IS AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A THREE YEAR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR PERSONAL INSTRUCTION, GENERAL USE FOR SHOOT 360 LOCATED AT 17255 COLLEGE BOULEVARD AND THE BP2 PLANNED MANUFACTURING DISTRICT.

STEPHANIE. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

STEPHANIE SULLIVAN WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

AS MENTIONED, ITEM TEN IS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR SHOOT 360.

WHICH, JUST SO YOU KNOW, IS BASKETBALL TRAINING, NOT A SHOOTING RANGE.

DIDN'T WANT ANYONE TO BE CONFUSED THERE.

IT'S LOCATED AT 17255 COLLEGE BOULEVARD, AND YOU CAN SEE THAT LOCATION IN RELATION TO THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY ON YOUR SCREEN RIGHT NOW. IT'S SORT OF IN THE SOUTH PORTION OF LENEXA.

JUST SOUTH OF K-10 NEAR COLLEGE BOULEVARD AND RENNER.

THIS IS THE LOCATION MAP, AND IT SHOWS THE PARCEL IN MORE DETAIL.

THE PARCEL IS BORDERED BY THE CITY OF OLATHE.

THAT RESIDENTIAL AREA YOU SEE OFF TO THE WEST OF THE PARCEL.

COLLEGE BOULEVARD IS AT THE NORTH THERE, AND BRITAIN STREET IS TO THE EAST.

THIS IS AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING.

AND THE PROPOSED TENANT SPACE IS ABOUT 19,000FT² OF THE OVERALL BUILDING HERE.

YOU CAN SEE ON THE BOTTOM PICTURE WHAT THE FACADE LOOKS LIKE FROM COLLEGE BOULEVARD, AND APPROXIMATELY WHAT THE BOUNDARIES OF THAT TENANT SPACE ARE.

YOU SEE A LOT OF PURPLE ON THE SCREEN HERE BECAUSE THIS IS AN INDUSTRIAL AREA AND IT IS ZONED BP2.

AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE LEFT IMAGE AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS, FUTURE LAND USE MAP CALLS FOR BUSINESS PARK TYPE USES HERE.

SO THE ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP ARE CONSISTENT WITH EACH OTHER.

AND I WILL NOTE THAT SOMETIMES THESE PERSONAL INSTRUCTION TYPE USES AND THIS ONE IS TECHNICALLY PERSONAL INSTRUCTION GENERAL. AS A TRAINING TYPE FACILITY, THEY ARE COMMONLY FOUND IN OUR MORE INDUSTRIAL AREAS.

A LOT OF TIMES THOSE USERS REALLY LIKE THIS BIG, WIDE OPEN INDUSTRIAL SPACE TO BE ABLE TO HAVE HIGHER CEILINGS, LESS SUPPORT COLUMNS, SO THEY HAVE ROOM TO RUN AROUND AND DO WHAT THEY NEED TO DO.

SO YOU DO SEE THESE PRETTY COMMONLY REQUESTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS WITHIN THESE INDUSTRIAL TYPE BUILDINGS.

AND I KNOW THAT THE COUNCIL HAS SEEN A FEW OF THESE WITHIN EVEN JUST THIS YEAR.

NOW ON THE SCREEN YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN.

[00:10:01]

AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A BASKETBALL TRAINING FACILITY.

YOU CAN SEE A FULL COURT HERE ON THE BOTTOM OF THE FLOOR.

PLAN A HALF COURT AND THEN THE APPLICANT CAN DO THIS EXPLANATION A LOT MORE JUSTICE THAN I CAN, BUT THEY HAVE SOME REALLY COOL TECHNOLOGY THAT THEY UTILIZE IN THESE OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SPACE THAT I THINK USES SOME COMPUTER AI TYPE SOFTWARE TO ACTUALLY MONITOR WHAT THE DIFFERENT BASKETBALL PLAYERS ARE DOING AND HOW THEY COULD WORK ON THOSE SKILLS BETTER.

SO WAY MORE HIGH TECH THAN THE BASKETBALL TRAINING THAT MOST OF US PROBABLY UTILIZED IN THE PAST.

AND THERE IS A MAXIMUM OF 30 TRAINEES AND FIVE STAFF MEMBERS.

PROPOSED. THE GENERAL HOURS OF OPERATION ARE 9 A.M.

TO 9 P.M..

AS YOU MAY HAVE READ IN OUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, THAT'S GOING TO VARY A LITTLE BIT DEPENDING ON THE SCHOOL YEAR.

SUMMERTIME HOURS ARE GOING TO BE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT THAN SCHOOL YEAR HOURS, JUST TO REFLECT THE STUDENTS NEEDS AND AVAILABILITY, AND THAT'S SORT OF THE SUMMARY OF THE FLOOR PLAN AND THE USE.

AS WITH ANY SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WE REVIEW THE 13 CRITERIA YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN HERE.

THOSE ARE ALL EXPLAINED IN DETAIL IN OUR PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT THAT WAS IN YOUR PACKET.

AND IF YOU'D LIKE FOR ME TO GO THROUGH ANYTHING IN MORE SPECIFIC DETAIL DURING MY PRESENTATION, I'M HAPPY TO DO THAT.

BUT I'M TRYING TO BE BRIEF IN WHAT WE GO OVER THIS EVENING.

I DO WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE TRAFFIC AND PARKING.

IT'S A LITTLE DIFFICULT TO CALCULATE JUST BECAUSE THE MAJORITY OF THIS INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IS CURRENTLY UNOCCUPIED.

SO WE DON'T REALLY HAVE THE PERFECT CALCULATION AND FORMULA OF PARKING.

BUT GIVEN THE ANTICIPATED TYPE OF USE HERE, WHICH IS MOSTLY OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE SPACE.

AND THAT PARKING WOULD BE SERVED WITH EVERYTHING YOU SEE IN GREEN.

THERE ARE DOCKS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING IN THAT WHITE AREA RIGHT IN HERE.

SO THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY VEHICLE PARKING.

IT'S GOING TO BE SEMI TRUCK TYPE PARKING.

THE PROPOSED TENANT SHOOT 360 IS IN THIS YELLOW AREA.

AND THE YELLOW PARKING SPACES HERE WOULD FULFILL THE PARKING REQUIREMENT.

AND THE TENANTS NEED AT ABOUT 33 PARKING SPACES.

THERE IS ANOTHER PART OF THE BUILDING THAT IS OCCUPIED HERE.

THEY HAVE A REQUIREMENT OF 19 SPACES FOR THEIR 29,000FT².

AND THAT IS IN THIS SORT OF BLUISH PURPLE AREA HERE.

SO YOU CAN SEE THERE'S A LOT OF PARKING STILL AVAILABLE HERE.

STAFF REALLY DOESN'T HAVE ANY CONCERN WITH THE PARKING AND TRAFFIC GENERATED FROM THIS PARTICULAR PROPOSED SPECIAL USE, AND WITH THAT, STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION DO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR SHOOT 360 FOR A PERSONAL INSTRUCTION.

GENERAL USE FOR A PERIOD OF THREE YEARS WITH NO CONDITIONS AND THREE YEARS IS THE STANDARD RECOMMENDATION FOR DURATION FOR THIS TYPE OF USE.

THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

QUESTIONS FOR STEPHANIE.

MR.. GROSS INCOME FOR ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO ADD FOR CONSIDERATION.

THANK YOU. OKAY.

WITH THAT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO PASS THE ORDINANCE APPROVING THE THREE YEAR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR PERSONAL INSTRUCTION.

GENERAL USE FOR SHOOT 360.

MOTION BY CRAIG, SECOND BY MARK.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ITEM 11 IS AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A THREE YEAR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A DAYCARE.

[11. Ordinance approving a three-year special use permit for a daycare, general use for Adventure Awaits located at 8132 Twilight Lane in the R-1, Residential Single-Family Zoning District]

GENERAL USE FOR ADVENTURE AWAITS, LOCATED AT 8132 TWILIGHT LANE IN THE R-1 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT.

HI. ALL RIGHT.

ME AGAIN. STEPHANIE SULLIVAN WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.

ITEM 11, AS MENTIONED, IS ADVENTURE AWAITS DAYCARE.

THIS IS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A DAYCARE.

GENERAL TYPE USE.

IT'S LOCATED AT 8132 TWILIGHT LANE, WHICH AS YOU CAN SEE ON OUR LOCATION MAP HERE, IS JUST EAST OF 435 AND GENERALLY BETWEEN 79TH AND 87TH.

THE ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE FOR THIS PROPERTY ARE DISPLAYED ON THE SCREEN HERE.

AGAIN, THE ZONING MAP INDICATES THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS R1 IN THE PALE YELLOW.

AND THEN THAT SECOND MAP ON THE SCREEN UNDER FUTURE LAND USE MAP IS FROM OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

AND IT INDICATES SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL TYPE USES.

SO AGAIN THE ZONING AND THE FUTURE LAND USE ARE COMPATIBLE IN THIS AREA.

AND AS YOU'VE SEEN RECENTLY WITH IN-HOME DAYCARES, THOSE ARE ALSO SOME USES THAT WE DO SEE KIND OF COME IN AS ACCESSORY TYPE USES, ALMOST TO THAT PRINCIPAL USE OF THE RESIDENCE.

SO A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUIRED IN THIS CASE BECAUSE THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO HAVE MORE THAN SIX CHILDREN BEING SERVED AT THE DAYCARE IN THE HOME.

IF THEY WERE TO HAVE JUST A CAP AT SIX CHILDREN, IT WOULD BE CONSIDERED A PERMITTED USE, NOT NEEDING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, AND IT WOULD BE A DAYCARE LIMITED USE.

[00:15:06]

SO, BECAUSE THEY ARE LOOKING TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF CHILDREN SERVED BY THIS USE, IT REQUIRES THAT SPECIAL USE PERMIT.

HERE IS AN AERIAL IMAGE OF THE SITE AND ALSO A STREET VIEW IMAGE OF THE HOME.

A FEW HALLOWEEN DECORATIONS OUT THERE AT THE TIME OF THIS PICTURE THERE ARE TWO EMPLOYEES, ONE OF WHICH IS THE PROPERTY OWNER AND ONE DOES NOT LIVE AT THE RESIDENCE.

THEY OPERATE GENERALLY DURING WORK HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, 730 TO 530.

AND AS MENTIONED, THEY CURRENTLY SERVE SIX CHILDREN AND THEY'RE LOOKING TO INCREASE TO THE MAXIMUM OF 12 CHILDREN.

AND JUST TO BE CLEAR, IF THERE IS ANY MORE THAN 12, IT BECOMES A COMMERCIAL DAYCARE AND HAS TO MOVE TO A COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT.

SO THAT WOULD NOT BE SOMETHING NECESSARILY ACCOUNTED FOR WITHIN A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PROCESS AT THIS PROPERTY.

AS MENTIONED IN OUR PREVIOUS CASE, THERE ARE 13 CRITERIA FOR REVIEW FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS, AND THOSE AGAIN ARE EXPLAINED IN FULL IN YOUR STAFF REPORTS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT WERE IN YOUR PACKET.

I'M HAPPY TO GO THROUGH ONE OR MORE OF THOSE IN MORE DETAIL.

I AM GOING TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT TRAFFIC AND PARKING THOUGH.

TWILIGHT LANE IS A LITTLE UNIQUE HERE IN THAT IT'S GOT A NICE CURVATURE.

AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN HERE, IT HAS BEEN DESIGNATED NO PARKING IN THAT AREA WHERE YOU SEE THE YELLOW LINE.

AND THAT'S FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY.

JUST SEEING AROUND THAT CURVE AND MAKING SURE THAT THERE'S NOT TOO MANY VEHICLES THERE TO MAKE A SAFE MANEUVER.

SO IT DOES LIMIT SOME PARKING A LITTLE BIT JUST ADJACENT TO THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY.

WE HAVE TALKED TO THE HOMEOWNER AND DAYCARE OPERATOR ABOUT PARKING SPECIFICALLY, AND THEY WILL BE DOING PICKUP AND DROP OFFS PRIMARILY IN THE DRIVEWAY, AND THE EMPLOYEE WILL BE PARKING ON STREET AS CLOSE AS PRACTICAL TO THE RESIDENTS.

THERE WAS SOME CONCERN WITH MAYBE JUST THE LACK OF PARKING IN THE VICINITY, BECAUSE IT'S NOT AVAILABLE ON THAT OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET THERE, AND AFTER HEARING SOME POTENTIAL CONCERNS FROM NEIGHBORS AND TALKING WITH THAT HOMEOWNER, THEY'VE BEEN WORKING TO ADDRESS THAT ISSUE EVEN CURRENTLY.

SO WITH THAT, STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION, DO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR ADVENTURE AWAITS DAY CARE.

GENERAL TYPE USE FOR THREE YEARS WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE DAYCARE EMPLOYEE PARK BASICALLY AS CLOSE AS PRACTICAL TO THE DAYCARE, WHILE MAINTAINING ALL OF THE LEGALITY OF ON STREET PARKING IN THE VICINITY.

AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

QUESTIONS ON THIS ONE? YEAH. CHRIS.

CLARIFY FOR ME, IF YOU WILL.

THE NO PARKING IS ONLY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE STREET, IS THAT CORRECT? SO THE EMPLOYEE COULD PARK? CORRECT. ON THE OTHER SIDE.

OKAY. MARK.

AND WHEN WAS THAT DESIGNATED? THAT THAT IS NO PARKING ALONG THERE.

DO YOU KNOW? I'M NOT CERTAIN WHEN IT WAS DESIGNATED, BUT THAT'S THE CURRENT CONDITION.

IS IT LIKE, LIT UP BY SIGNS LIKE NO PARKING SIGNS? OR HOW DO THEY DESIGNATE THAT? YES. THERE WOULD BE NO PARKING SIGNS IN THAT AREA.

THANK YOU. OKAY.

DO WE HAVE THE APPLICANT WITH US TONIGHT? ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO ADD? YOU WANT TO COME UP TO THE MICROPHONE? SURE. OKAY. AND WHO IS THIS GUEST? THIS IS MINE.

SHE DOESN'T GO. SHE DOESN'T LEAVE AT 530, UNFORTUNATELY.

SO HERE SHE IS.

HELLO THERE. THIS IS ELLIE.

BUT, YEAH, WE MOVED INTO THE AREA ABOUT SIX MONTHS AGO.

I'VE BEEN IN BUSINESS FOR FIVE YEARS.

WE JUST MOVED FROM OVERLAND PARK.

AND SO THAT WAS IN A REGULATION TO HAVE THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN OVERLAND PARK.

BUT I'M LICENSED AND HAVE BEEN FOR FIVE YEARS.

AND SO YEAH, WHEN WE MOVED THERE, WE HAVE THAT NO PARKING ON THAT SIDE, WHICH IS A BIT OF A INCONVENIENCE, YOU KNOW, WITH IT BEING A DAYCARE.

BUT WHAT I'VE DONE IS I KEEP OUR HOUSEHOLD VEHICLES IN THE GARAGE NOW THAT WE'RE ALL MOVED IN AND GOT CLEARED SOME SPACE OUT.

THAT WAS THE ISSUE WITH THE NEIGHBORS INITIALLY, BECAUSE I HAD THE TWO HOUSEHOLD VEHICLES, AS YOU SAW IN THE PREVIOUS PICTURE IN OUR DRIVEWAY, AND THEN PARENTS WERE USING VERY BRIEFLY THAT NO PARKING AREA.

SO, SOME CONCERNS ARISE.

AND THEN NOW WE'RE ABLE TO PUT OUR TWO HOUSEHOLD VEHICLES IN THE DRIVEWAY.

AND SO NOW WE HAVE BASICALLY THE, THE WHOLE DRIVEWAY FOR THE PARENTS TO DO PICKUP AND DROP OFF.

AND MY EMPLOYEE PARKS IN THE IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE STREET.

SO JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT, BUT I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY.

[00:20:01]

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? OKAY. WITH THAT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO PASS AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE THREE YEAR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR DAY CARE.

GENERAL USE FOR ADVENTURE AWAITS AT 8132 TWILIGHT LANE.

SECOND MOTION BY COURTNEY, SECOND BY MELANIE.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT.

ITEM 12 IS A CONSIDERATION OF REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAN, KNOWN AS ROSS CANYON, FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 93RD STREET BETWEEN MILL CREEK

[12. Consideration of a rezoning and preliminary plan known as Ross Canyon for a multifamily residential development on property located near 93rd Street between Mill Creek Road and Renner Boulevard]

AND RENNER BOULEVARD.

ITEM 12 A IS AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PROPERTY FROM AG AGRICULTURAL TO R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS TO RP 3 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY AND RP FOUR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY DISTRICTS.

ITEM 12 B IS APPROVAL OF THE COMPANION PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR ROSS CANYON.

STEPHANIE. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU AGAIN. MAYOR AND COUNCIL STEPHANIE SULLIVAN WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.

AS MENTIONED, ITEM 12 IS FOR ROSS CANYON.

AND THIS IS A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING A REQUEST FOR REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED PLAT APPROVAL.

THIS IS LOCATED NEAR 93RD STREET BETWEEN MILL CREEK ROAD AND RENNER BOULEVARD.

AND YOU CAN SEE ON THIS LOCATION MAP HERE WE ARE HERE.

JUST TO GIVE YOU SOME CONTEXT.

THIS IS JUST SOUTH OF CITY CENTER, AND HIGHLIGHTED IN THIS RED BOX IS THE SUBJECT SITE.

YOU CAN SEE HERE MILL CREEK ROAD COMES THROUGH THE COTTONWOOD CANYON SUBDIVISION.

AND THEN THIS AREA HERE THAT YOU SEE UNDER DEVELOPMENT IS THE REFLECTIONS DEVELOPMENT.

THE APARTMENT PORTION IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, AND THE OFFICE WOULD BE A LATER PHASE ON THE NORTH HERE.

WE WILL HAVE FUTURE 91ST STREET JUST TO THE NORTH OF THAT DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN LIFETIME AND REFLECTIONS.

AND 93RD STREET HAS ACTUALLY BEEN CONSTRUCTED, BUT IT'S NOT QUITE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC YET DUE TO THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTION AT REFLECTIONS.

BUT AS PART OF THIS PROJECT THAT WILL ACTUALLY CONTINUE THROUGH.

SPOILER ALERT. I'LL GET TO THAT IN A SECOND.

NOW ON THIS SCREEN, YOU CAN SEE OUR ZONING MAP AND OUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE SITE, AS YOU AGAIN CAN SEE OUTLINED IN RED IS R1 AND AG, WHICH STANDS FOR AGRICULTURAL.

THAT'S SORT OF THE DEFAULT ZONING FOR PROPERTIES BEFORE THEY'RE DEVELOPED IN THE CITY.

SO PRETTY TYPICAL.

NO ONE'S REALLY PROBABLY DOING ANY FARMING ON THE SITE RIGHT NOW.

AND IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IT IS CURRENTLY DESIGNATED FOR HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.

I WILL NOTE THAT WHEN OUR COMPREHENSIVE OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS UPDATED IN JULY OF THIS YEAR, THAT DID CHANGE.

ORIGINALLY FROM A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATION TO A HIGH DENSITY.

SO THAT'S WHY YOU SEE THAT ON OUR CURRENT MAP HERE, RATHER THAN MEDIUM DENSITY LIKE IT WAS IN THE PAST.

LOTS OF COLORS GOING ON HERE.

THIS AREA IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH WHAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CALLS FOR AS FAR AS THE HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS FRAMEWORK MAP THAT YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN HERE.

THERE'S A LITTLE INSET THAT WE BLEW UP SO YOU COULD SEE THAT SUBJECT SITE AND WHAT IT CALLS FOR WITHIN THIS PARTICULAR MAP, WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. JUST LIKE SPECIAL USE PERMITS, WE REVIEW THESE SAME 13 CRITERIA WITH REZONING REQUESTS.

WE LIKE TO KEEP IT EASY AND LOOK AT ALL THE SAME THINGS.

AND I WILL GO THROUGH QUITE A FEW OF THESE IN A LITTLE BIT OF DETAIL JUST TO GO THROUGH THAT REVIEW.

BUT EACH ONE OF THESE, AGAIN, WAS DETAILED IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WITH A RESPONSE AS TO HOW IT MEETS THESE DIFFERENT CRITERIA.

I'M HAPPY TO GO THROUGH THOSE IF NEEDED.

REALLY QUICK, LET'S TALK ABOUT THE PROPOSED PROJECT.

SO AS I MENTIONED, THIS IS A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT AND IT HAS A TOWNHOME COMPONENT AND THEN A TYPICAL APARTMENT STYLE COMPONENT TO IT AS WELL.

AND THE APPLICANT HAS DONE A GOOD JOB OF BREAKING THIS UP AND SORT OF USING CONTEXTUAL DENSITY, BY THE WAY THAT THEY'VE DESIGNED THEIR SITE.

SO SINCE WE KNOW WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT LOWER DENSITY HERE ON THE WEST WITH THE COTTONWOOD CANYON SUBDIVISION AND THE FAIRWAY VILLAS, AND THEY'VE CHOSEN TO DO THE RP3, WHICH IS A MORE MEDIUM DENSITY TYPE ZONING.

AND UP HERE IN THIS NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE, THESE LIGHTER YELLOW BUILDINGS ARE ALL TOWNHOME STYLE.

SO, THEY'LL BE A LITTLE BIT SHORTER BUILDINGS, A LITTLE BIT LESS DENSE.

AND THEN THE APPLICANT IS LOOKING TO DO THOSE TALLER, MULTIFAMILY APARTMENT STYLE BUILDINGS IN THIS DARKER GOLD COLOR WITH THE BROWN BACKGROUND, OUR P4 ZONING DISTRICT.

[00:25:02]

THE APPLICANT CHOSE RP4 RATHER THAN RP FIVE.

EVEN THOUGH WE'RE GOING TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT SOME HEIGHT DEVIATION REQUESTS.

SO, I KNOW WE'VE HEARD THAT COMBINATION BEFORE.

SO, I'LL GIVE YOU SOME MORE DETAILS ON THAT IN THIS PRESENTATION.

AND YOU CAN ALSO SEE HERE.

AS I MENTIONED, 93RD STREET WILL BE CONNECTING OVER TO MILL CREEK ROAD.

AND THIS IS THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT.

A LOT OF THIS HAS TO DO WITH THE STREAM BUFFER THAT BISECTS THE SITE, AND GRAIN CHANGES AS WELL ON THE SITE.

SO, IT'LL ALSO HAVE A LEG UP HERE TO 91ST STREET AND YOU'LL SEE SOME IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY AS PART OF THIS PROJECT AS WELL. SO, THIS DID GO TO PLANNING COMMISSION ORIGINALLY ON SEPTEMBER 30TH, AND THEY ASKED TO CONTINUE THE PROJECT AND GAVE SOME DIRECTION TO THE APPLICANT.

THE DIRECTION CAME FROM NOT ONLY COMMISSIONERS.

WE HAD SOME RESIDENTS AT THAT MEETING AND THEN STAFF HAD SOME DIRECTION FOR SOME SORT OF OPEN ITEMS THAT WE WANTED TO RESOLVE AND GET A LITTLE BIT BETTER QUALITY OUT OF SOME ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT AS WELL.

SO THESE ARE SOME OF THE MAIN POINTS SUMMARIZED HERE.

THESE FIVE ITEMS THAT THE APPLICANT TOOK BACK HAD SOME HOMEWORK AND ACTUALLY BROUGHT THIS BACK TO OUR NOVEMBER 4TH MEETING AT PLANNING COMMISSION.

SO WE HAD SOME TIME TO WORK WITH THAT APPLICANT AND BE ABLE TO GO THROUGH THESE THINGS IN DETAIL.

THEY WERE VERY RESPONSIVE.

AND I THINK WE'RE HAPPY TO SHOW YOU THE FINAL PRODUCT OF THAT BACK AND FORTH THAT WE DID.

SO ON THE SCREEN HERE, YOU'LL SEE THERE WERE SOME DIRECTION TO REVISE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING HEIGHT, SOME CONCERNS WITH THE WEST BUFFER AREA BASICALLY BETWEEN THAT COTTONWOOD CANYON SUBDIVISION AND SOME BUILDINGS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING SOME LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING.

KNOWING A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THE PHASING PLAN AND WHAT'S GOING TO BE BUILT AND WHEN, AND CONFIRMING THAT RETAINING WALLS ARE MEETING CODE REQUIREMENTS, BECAUSE WE DO, AS YOU REMEMBER FROM OUR FENCE AND WALL CODE NOT THAT LONG AGO, HAVE A REQUIREMENT THAT THE RETAINING WALLS CANNOT EXCEED TEN FEET PER TIER.

SO WE DON'T WANT TO END UP WITH ANY GIGANTIC RETAINING WALLS KNOWING THAT WE HAVE A LOT OF GRADE CHANGE ON THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY.

SO HERE I TOOK A FEW OF THE RENDERINGS FROM SORT OF THE ORIGINAL AND THE REVISED TO SHOW YOU THE ARCHITECTURE CHANGES. ON THE TOP OF THE SCREEN, YOU'LL SEE WHAT THE ORIGINAL DESIGN WAS AND THE REVISED VERSION IS ON THE BOTTOM OF THE SCREEN.

I THOUGHT THESE WOULD BE BEST PRESENTED RIGHT ON THE SAME SLIDE TOGETHER, SO YOU CAN KIND OF COMPARE.

BUT AGAIN, THE APPLICANT WORKED WELL WITH STAFF AND THE SUGGESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO WITH RESPECT TO ARCHITECTURE, AND REALLY MADE THIS A UNIQUE PROJECT, TAKING FORTH SOME OF THE DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT THEY ORIGINALLY HAD AND THEN ELABORATED UPON THOSE AND MADE THEM FIT INTO SORT OF WHAT WE HAD SUGGESTED, JUST WITH THE CITY OF LENEXA DESIGN STANDARDS.

HERE'S ONE OF THE THREE STORY BUILDINGS IT WAS ORIGINALLY.

WHAT I WOULD SAY IS PRETTY MUNDANE LOOKING.

IT HAD A SCREENING ELEMENT ON THE ROOF, AND I KNOW ALSO, IT'S PROBABLY NOT A FAIR COMPARISON TO SHOW YOU A 2D VERSUS A PRETTY 3D RENDERING HERE.

BUT IT CERTAINLY LOOKS WAY BETTER DOWN HERE WITH THAT 3D RENDERING.

SO YOU CAN SEE HERE THERE'S JUST A LOT MORE ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL AND THE ROOF LINE CHANGED.

SO WE'RE ABLE TO ACTUALLY GET SOME OF THOSE ROOF LINES TO BE A LITTLE BIT MORE ALIGNED WITH THE REST OF THE PROJECT.

AND THOSE ROOF LINES YOU SAW IN THE PREVIOUS SLIDE.

HERE'S ANOTHER VIEW OF THAT SAME BUILDING.

I GUESS THIS IS A LITTLE BIT FANCIER RENDERING OF WHAT YOU JUST SAW ON THE TOP OF THE LAST SCREEN, BUT STILL PRETTY FLAT AND BASIC.

AND THEN THEY WERE ABLE TO ADD NOT ONLY SOME COLOR, BUT SOME DIFFERENT TYPES OF PATIO ELEMENTS FOR THEIR RESIDENTS TO ENJOY.

AND THEN THEY ALSO ADDED SOME OF THESE SORT OF ROOF BUMP OUTS, IF YOU WILL, TO LET SOME MORE LIGHT IN.

AND AGAIN, KIND OF MAKE IT RELATE BACK OVER TO THAT SAME ELEMENT THEY FEATURED ON THEIR TALLER APARTMENT BUILDINGS.

HERE'S AGAIN ORIGINAL AND REVISED.

THIS IS FOR THE TOWNHOMES.

THESE ARE TWO STORIES YOU CAN SEE.

AND THEY'RE KIND OF I WOULD SAY EUROPEAN MEETS PRAIRIE STYLE ARCHITECTURE.

THERE'S NOT QUITE AS MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BEFORE AND AFTER HERE.

A LITTLE BIT MORE COLOR VARIATION AND DESIGN DETAILS THAT YOU MAY OR MAY NOT CATCH IN HERE WITH THE DIFFERENCES IN THE GARAGE DOORS AND SOME PLANTINGS AND

[00:30:05]

PATIOS.

BUT AGAIN, I THINK ALL OF THE DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS REALLY RELATE TO EACH OTHER AND FIT THE ESTHETIC THAT STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION WERE LOOKING FOR. I ALLUDED A LITTLE BIT TO BUILDING HEIGHT, AND I JUST WANTED TO SHOW YOU THE DIFFERENCE IN THIS PARTICULAR ONE.

AND THIS IS THAT THREE STORY BUILDING I SHOWED YOU.

AND JUST FOR COMPARISON SAKE, THESE BUILDINGS DID GET A LITTLE BIT TALLER, BUT IT'S BECAUSE WE GOT A BIG WIN, I THINK, IN THE ROOF LINE AND THE WAY THAT THE SCREENING FOR THE ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNITS ARE GOING TO BE ACCOMPLISHED, SO THEY'RE GOING TO BE HIDDEN, I BELIEVE, BEHIND THIS SORT OF MANSARD STYLE ROOF.

AND THEN INSTEAD OF JUST HAVING LIKE MORE OF A COMMERCIAL LOOKING SCREEN WALL ON TOP.

AND SO I THINK, AGAIN, THE APPLICANT DID A GOOD JOB OF LISTENING TO THE COMMENTS AND UPGRADING THE ARCHITECTURE, EVEN THOUGH THESE BUILDINGS DID GET A LITTLE BIT TALLER.

AND TO START SOME CONVERSATION ABOUT BUILDING HEIGHT.

THIS ON TOP OF YOUR SCREEN.

HERE IS A SECTION OF THE SITE.

SO YOU CAN KIND OF SEE LIKE IF WE TOOK A SLICE OUT OF IT WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE.

SO YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENT GRADE CHANGE ON THE PROPERTY.

AND THESE LINES HERE, THIS BLACK ONE THAT'S DASHED AND THIS BLACK ONE THAT'S DASHED ARE THE SUBJECT SITES, PROPERTY LINES.

SO THIS IS ALL OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.

AND THEN THIS IS REFLECTIONS OVER HERE, THE APARTMENTS THAT ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

AND THEN OVER HERE AS YOU GO A LITTLE BIT FURTHER DOWN THE HILL, THIS IS THE FAIRWAY VILLAS.

THAT'S A NEARBY STRUCTURE.

AND THEN THIS IS THE COTTONWOOD CANYON SINGLE FAMILY HOMES DOWN HERE.

SO EVERYTHING IS PRETTY DIFFERENTIATED HERE AS FAR AS THE HEIGHT GOES BECAUSE OF THE GRADE.

AND YOU CAN SEE ACROSS THE BOARD HERE AND NOTHING'S REALLY NECESSARILY TALLER THAN WHAT'S ALREADY BEING BUILT HERE AT REFLECTIONS.

AND YOU CAN SEE THAT STREAM BUFFER, THAT STREAM CORRIDOR AREA HERE THAT'S GOING TO BE UNDEVELOPED.

IT'S GOING TO REMAIN GREEN SPACE BECAUSE OF THE DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS THAT GO WITH THAT.

AND AGAIN, YOU CAN ALSO RELATE THIS TO WHAT YOU SEE HERE ON THE SCREEN.

JUST TO GIVE YOU SOME MORE CONTEXT OF WHAT THOSE BUILDINGS LOOK LIKE.

SO THIS IS THEIR TALLEST APARTMENT BUILDING HERE FIVE STORIES.

AND AGAIN IT STILL COMES IN ESSENTIALLY, IF YOU LOOK AT IT FROM THIS SORT OF SITE SECTION, VIEW UNDER WHAT'S BEING CONSTRUCTED AT REFLECTIONS, WHICH IS ALSO FIVE STORIES.

STEPHANIE, IF I COULD HAVE YOU PAUSE THERE FOR ONE SECOND.

WHAT I DIDN'T SEE IN ALL THESE SECTIONS WAS THE DISTANCE FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE VILLAS AND THE COTTONWOOD CANYON, AND AT 1 TO 100 IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S AT LEAST 100FT, SOMETIMES MORE.

YES. ANY GUESS ON WHAT THAT DISTANCE IS? LET ME SEE IF WE'VE GOT THAT IN OUR STAFF REPORT.

I KNOW WE DID EVALUATE THAT.

AND WE DO HAVE OUR APPLICANT IN THE AUDIENCE.

IF THEY CAN ANSWER THAT FASTER THAN I CAN.

COTTONWOOD CANYON IS 588FT AWAY.

THANK YOU. 588FT FOR COTTONWOOD.

THANK YOU FOR THE MICROPHONE.

OKAY. THANK YOU TYLER.

I HAD A FEELING YOU WOULD KNOW THAT.

FOR CIVILIANS, HOW LONG IS A FOOTBALL FIELD? I THINK IT'S ABOUT A FOOTBALL FIELD.

RIGHT? YEAH. I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY FEET TO YARDS IS FOOTBALL FIELD? OKAY. OKAY.

MORE THAN A FOOTBALL FIELD? YES. ALL RIGHT.

SO TALKING ABOUT BUILDING HEIGHT, THERE IS A DEVIATION REQUEST.

I WANT TO NOTE HERE THAT UP TO 47.25FT IS ALLOWED BY CODE, EVEN THOUGH YOU SEE 35FT IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED IN THIS TABLE.

THE CODE ACCOUNTS FOR UP TO A 35% INCREASE IF CERTAIN PARAMETERS ARE MET AND ESTHETICS ARE ACHIEVED.

AND SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT IN THIS CASE, STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND ALLOWING THAT EXTRA 35FT.

SO THERE ARE A COUPLE OF THESE BUILDINGS THE BUILDING SIX AND SEVEN THAT DO FALL BELOW THAT THRESHOLD AND DON'T NECESSARILY NEED THE DEVIATION. HOWEVER, THE BUILDINGS ONE THROUGH FIVE WOULD NEED THAT.

AND THOSE ARE VARYING IN HEIGHT FROM ANYWHERE FROM 52.5FT TO THE TALLEST ONE AT 64.25FT. AND I BELIEVE PERCENTAGE WISE, THAT MEANS WE'RE LOOKING AT ANYWHERE FROM INSTEAD OF A 35% INCREASE. IT IS A, I BELIEVE, 60 TO 80% CENT INCREASE, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN.

SO STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE DEVIATION REQUEST BECAUSE WE DID YIELD BETTER ARCHITECTURE AS A PART OF THE EXERCISE, GOING BACK WITH THE APPLICANT

[00:35:09]

AND IMPROVING THE ARCHITECTURE AND ROOF LINES WITH THE PROJECT.

AND WE BELIEVE THAT BECAUSE OF THE UNIQUE GRADE ON THE SITE AND THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT, THAT THE HEIGHT THAT IS PROPOSED IS APPROPRIATE, AND AS WELL AS COMPARING IT TO THE REFLECTIONS DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS APPROVED WITH THE HEIGHT DEVIATION JUST TO THE EAST.

AND STEPHANIE, WITH THAT HEIGHT, YOU STILL DON'T INCREASE THE NUMBER OF UNITS IN THOSE BUILDINGS.

CORRECT. OKAY.

YEP. AND A LOT OF TIMES TO THESE NEWER MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS, WANT TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT TO HAVE THE AMENITY OF THE TALLER CEILINGS IN THEIR UNITS TOO.

IT'S A LOT MORE TYPICAL TO HAVE TALLER CEILINGS.

AND IT I BELIEVE, HELPS WITH THE VALUE OF THE BUILDING ITSELF, TOO.

AND THE RENTAL RATE.

SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAD TALKED ABOUT WITH THE APPLICANT AT THE FIRST PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WAS THE BUFFER ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE.

AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE IS PART OF THE GOLF COURSE ALONG THIS WEST SIDE.

AND THE APPLICANT WAS ABLE TO RELOCATE SOME OF THESE APARTMENT BUILDINGS FURTHER AWAY FROM THE WEST PROPERTY LINE.

AND SOME OF THE SIDEWALKS WERE MOVED IN THIS AREA.

THERE IS STILL A DRIVE AISLE.

HERE THE DRIVE AISLES ARE NECESSARY FOR SAFETY ACCESS TO THE BUILDING, SO WE CAN'T REALLY JUST DELETE DRIVE AISLES.

I DO WANT TO NOTE, TOO, THAT THEY ALSO DID INCREASE THE LANDSCAPING ALONG THIS PARTICULAR AREA TO, AND THERE'LL BE A FAIR AMOUNT OF TREE PRESERVATION ON THIS SITE AS WELL DUE TO THE STREAM CORRIDOR.

SO JUST TO GIVE YOU A SIDE BY SIDE, THIS IS THE ORIGINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN.

THIS IS THE REVISED.

YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THE DIFFERENCE IF YOU LOOK BACK AND FORTH AGAIN.

THIS BUILDING WAS MOVED OVER.

THERE'S MORE SPACE IN HERE THAN WHAT IS ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE SCREEN HERE.

AND THERE'S A LOT MORE GREEN LANDSCAPING ON THIS PLAN THAN YOU SAW GOING ALL THE WAY DOWN ON THIS PLAN.

THERE'S SOME TREE PRESERVATION ON BOTH VERSIONS OF THIS PLAN, UP IN THIS TRIANGULAR AREA HERE.

THAT'LL BE NORTH OF 91ST STREET.

AND THEN THIS IS THAT STREAM CORRIDOR AREA THAT WILL REMAIN UNDEVELOPED AND PRESERVED AS WELL.

AND LOTS MORE NEW PLANTINGS.

THIS DOESN'T SHOW EVERY SINGLE LITTLE FOUNDATION PLANTING EITHER.

PART OF THE PARKING LOT ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE WAS ALSO REVISED TO ACCOUNT FOR SOME OF THE RESIDENTS CONCERNS WITH THE GLARE OF HEADLIGHTS.

AND SO THE APPLICANTS LATEST PLAN SHOWS THAT THEY BROKE APART THIS PARTICULAR BUILDING AND THEN SANDWICHED THE PARKING IN BETWEEN SO THAT RATHER THAN HAVING THE PARKING LOT CLOSEST TO SOME OF THAT SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD, IT WOULD HAVE ESSENTIALLY AN EXTRA BUFFER WITH THAT BUILDING. SO THE OTHER BONUS TO THAT IS THAT IT MAKES THE PARKING A LITTLE MORE ACCESSIBLE AND CENTRALIZED TO THEIR OTHER BUILDINGS, TOO, RATHER THAN IF SOMEONE LIVED IN THESE UNITS AND ENDED UP PARKING ALL THE WAY OVER HERE, IT'S A LITTLE BIT CLOSER AND CONVENIENT.

ANOTHER THING THAT THE RESIDENTS WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPLICANT ADDRESSED, AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF ECHOED THIS AS WELL, IS TRAFFIC CALMING. THERE'S BEEN SOME CONCERN ABOUT THIS NEW STREET AND BASICALLY CONNECTING OVER TO RENNER TO THE 435 RAMPS OVER THERE. WHILE IT WILL BE A NICE CONVENIENCE, THERE IS SOME CONCERN OF POSSIBLY GENERATING TRAFFIC GOING FROM THIS DEVELOPMENT THROUGH HERE, MAYBE UP NORTH TO GET TO CITY CENTER OR OVER TO GETTING TO RIDGEVIEW AND PRAIRIE STAR PARKWAY TO GO SOUTH OR WEST IN LENEXA. SO BECAUSE OF THAT, WE'RE LOOKING AT A COUPLE DIFFERENT OPTIONS WITH THE APPLICANT.

I DO WANT TO NOTE AGAIN THIS IS THE PRELIMINARY PLAN PHASE.

SO THESE ARE NOT NECESSARILY SET IN STONE AT THIS POINT.

BUT THESE ARE THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE'VE WORKED OUT WITH THE APPLICANT AS OF RIGHT NOW FOR SOME TRAFFIC CALMING FEATURES.

YOU CAN SEE THERE IS AN EXISTING TRAFFIC CIRCLE RIGHT HERE AND THAT IS PROPOSED TO REMAIN.

THE CART CROSSING PATH WILL BE REALIGNED TO BE IN A SAFER LOCATION.

AND WE'RE LOOKING AT DOING A DIVIDED STREET MEDIAN HERE, SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU SEE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE SCREEN HERE.

THAT JUST KIND OF BOWS OUT THE STREET, GIVES IT A LITTLE ESTHETIC VALUE, AS WELL AS KEEPS YOU FROM HAVING A STRAIGHT ROAD TO GO A LITTLE BIT FASTER AND GIVES YOU SOMETHING TO SLOW DOWN FOR.

SO THOSE ARE THE INITIAL TRAFFIC CALMING THOUGHTS, AND WE'RE ALSO CONTINUING DISCUSSIONS WITH COTTONWOOD CANYON AS A WHOLE ON OTHER MITIGATING TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES WE COULD DO

[00:40:04]

WITHIN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT AREN'T NECESSARILY WITHIN THIS PROJECT SITE.

MARK. STEPHANIE, I HAVE A QUESTION ON THAT ROAD ALIGNMENT.

WAS THERE ANY EVER ANY THOUGHT IN REGARDS TO INSTEAD OF IT ACTUALLY TYING INTO THAT ROAD, ACTUALLY KIND OF LOOPING BACK TO RENDER ALONG 91ST SO THAT THIS IS A T OFF OF IT.

YOU KNOW, THIS, THIS, THIS STREET RIGHT HERE IS A T IS THAT EVER BEEN PROPOSED? AND BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH DENSITY WITH THE REFLECTIONS IN THIS, IN THIS ONE AND THEN WHAT'S I THINK WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN MAYBE NORTH OF REFLECTIONS.

IS THAT ANOTHER PHASE POTENTIALLY OF BETWEEN THE APARTMENTS AND REFLECTIONS, AND 91ST IS PRELIMINARY PLANNED FOR AN OFFICE DEVELOPMENT OR AN OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. SO THAT WOULD BE THE NORTH SIDE OF REFLECTIONS.

ONE VERSION THAT THE APPLICANT PRESENTED TO STAFF DID ESSENTIALLY HAVE 93RD AND 91ST AS THE MAIN ROADS AND THEN TEEING OFF TOWARD MILL CREEK.

OUR ENGINEERING TEAM AND TIM GREEN CAN SPEAK TO THIS POTENTIALLY, IF WE NEED TO GET TOO TECHNICAL HERE, SINCE I'M NOT THE ENGINEER.

WE DID TALK THROUGH THAT WITH OUR TRAFFIC TEAM AND OUR ENGINEERING TEAM AND DETERMINED THAT THIS WAS THE IDEAL ROUTE.

TIM, WANT TO ADD TO THAT? I WOULD JUST SAY WE'VE HAD THIS PROPOSED LAYOUT OF THESE CONNECTIONS FOR PROBABLY 20 YEARS, SINCE CITY CENTER WAS INITIALLY CONSTRUCTED AND PROVIDING ALL THIS ACCESS.

SO WE'RE KIND OF WORKING THE PLAN THAT WE'VE ALWAYS HAD.

WELL, WITH THAT, THE PLAN WASN'T FOR THIS HIGHER DENSITY.

BECAUSE ZONING WAS R1 AT ONE POINT.

AND SO I THINK THAT'S A LITTLE CONVOLUTED AT THIS POINT.

THE MORE ACCESS, I THINK THE PREFERENCE THAT WE HAD FROM A TRAFFIC STANDPOINT.

IF YOU DON'T, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE ALL OF THESE PEOPLE GOING STRAIGHT OUT TO RENTER.

IF YOU WANT TO GET IF YOU WANTED TO GET UP TO CITY CENTER, YOU WOULD HAVE TO GO OUT ONTO RENTER, COME UP AND AROUND.

SO THERE'S PLUSES AND BENEFITS.

YOU'RE CORRECT. WELL, THE REASON I ACTUALLY AND I UNFORTUNATELY DRIVE THROUGH THIS NEIGHBORHOOD A LOT AND IT'S TIGHT STREETS AND STUFF IN THERE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT THERE NORTH OF THE TRAFFIC CIRCLE.

AND IT'S REALLY TIGHT WITH THAT PARALLEL PARKING ALONG THERE AND MORE, MORE TRAFFIC HEADING TO CITY CENTER FROM THAT DIRECTION.

THAT CONCERNS ME BECAUSE I DO DRIVE THE THAT SAME WAY A LOT TO CITY TO CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS EVERY, EVERY TUESDAY.

AND, AND I THINK IT'S PRETTY TIGHT.

AND SO YOU HAD THAT MUCH DENSITY.

I'D RATHER HAVE TO.

YOU KNOW, IF I'M LIVING IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, I'D RATHER FOLKS ARE RUNNING OUT TOWARDS RENNER TO GET TO CITY CENTER.

ONE OF THE BIG ISSUES ON THAT, I THINK WHAT YOU'RE ASKING MAYBE, IS THAT THAT WE DIDN'T MAKE THE CONNECTION UP WHERE THE EXISTING TRAFFIC CIRCLE IS CORRECT.

YOU MEAN AT 91ST AND RENNER? NO. WHAT DO YOU WHAT ARE YOU MENTIONING? YOU CAN USE THE MOUSE.

DOES THE MOUSE SHOW UP THERE? IS THIS THE CONNECTION YOU'RE CONCERNED ABOUT? YES. YEAH.

THE BIGGEST ISSUE WE HAD, WE WANTED TO MAKE THIS LOOP.

BUT TO SERVE THIS AREA HERE, FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIRES TWO ACCESS POINTS.

AND YOU CAN'T REALLY TO TRY TO CROSS THIS CREEK OVER HERE.

IT'S A GOOD FILL.

YOU'RE PROBABLY LOOKING AT A BRIDGE.

IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO GET TWO CONNECTIONS ACROSS THAT STREAM CORRIDOR.

SO THE ONE STREAM CONNECTION OR STREAM CROSSING HERE PROVIDES YOU ONE ACCESS POINT AND THEN, COMING FROM THE NORTH, PROVIDES A SECOND ACCESS POINT.

NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE ACCESS POINT IS REQUIRED.

I WAS JUST, YOU KNOW, AS THAT STREET IS KIND OF WINDING IN THERE, IT KIND OF DIRECTS PEOPLE INTO MILL CREEK VERSUS IF IT WAS HEADED BACK TOWARDS RENNER AS A T INTO THAT ROAD, IT TO ME, IT WOULD HELP PEOPLE NOT NECESSARILY FOCUS AND GO INTO MILL CREEK, WHICH IS A LOT NARROWER ROADS. THAT'S JUST MY OPINION.

I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.

THANK YOU. THANKS, TIM.

OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TRAFFIC CALMING SLIDE BEFORE I GO ON? OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

MOVING ON TO TALK ABOUT SITE PLAN A LITTLE BIT.

I KNOW WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT ALREADY ABOUT THIS BEING A MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT WITH APARTMENTS AND TOWNHOMES.

JUST TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL ON WHERE THOSE ARE AT.

THERE ARE 95 TOWNHOMES IN THE TWO AND THREE STORY BUILDINGS.

AGAIN, THOSE ARE THE PALER YELLOW COLOR.

AND THEN 74 APARTMENTS AND THREE STORY BUILDINGS HERE, AND APPROXIMATELY 300 APARTMENTS OVER HERE IN FOUR AND FIVE STORY BUILDINGS.

AND AS DISCUSSED, THESE ARE THE NEW PUBLIC STREETS.

93RD STREET AS IT MEETS UP WITH MILL CREEK ROAD AND 91ST STREET.

[00:45:02]

AND AGAIN, THIS WILL HAVE TO BE IMPROVED UP HERE AS WELL.

SO WITH THE DENSITY, I MENTIONED EARLIER THAT THEY WENT WITH A PROPOSED P3 AND P4 ZONING RATHER THAN P5 TO ACCOUNT FOR SOME OF THAT HEIGHT.

THEY WOULD NOT NEED A HEIGHT DEVIATION HAD THEY GONE WITH P5, BUT IT WOULD HAVE OPENED THEM UP FOR MANY MORE DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.

P4 IS LIMITED TO 16 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, SO THEY ARE UNDER THAT AT JUST OVER 12 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE WITH THE PROPOSED LAYOUT, AND THEN THE TOWNHOMES ARE JUST UNDER SEVEN UNITS PER ACRE.

THESE NUMBERS THAT YOU SEE CALLED OUT WITH PLUS AND MINUS FOUR IS DUE TO BASICALLY SPLITTING THAT ONE PIECE OF THE TOWNHOMES TO PUT THE PARKING LOT IN THE MIDDLE.

SO YOU SEE THOSE NUMBERS CHANGE JUST A LITTLE BIT THERE.

BUT THE OVERALL TOTAL IS STILL 469 DWELLING UNITS.

AND THE MAXIMUM THEY COULD HAVE ON THE SITE WITH THE ZONING IS 651 DWELLING UNITS.

AGAIN, BECAUSE OF SOME OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

I WOULD SAY LIMITATIONS OF THE SITE WITH THE STREAM CORRIDOR AND THE GRADING AND THOSE TYPES OF THINGS.

THE NEED FOR THE PUBLIC STREETS, THEY ARE LIMITED ON WHAT THEY CAN REALLY BUILD OUT ON THE SITE.

SO ONLY A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF THE SITE IS REALLY DEVELOPABLE.

AND WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT TEN STORY BUILDINGS HERE TO MAXIMIZE THOSE UNITS.

THIS IS THE PHASING PLAN.

AND BASICALLY THE PHASE ONE IS GOING TO BE THIS AREA IN THE ORANGE.

AND THE PHASE TWO WILL BE THE AREA YOU SEE IN THE YELLOW.

AND PHASE ONE IS ANTICIPATED FOR CONSTRUCTION TO START IN MARCH 2025.

NOT THAT LONG, NOT THAT FAR AWAY FROM NOW.

THEY STILL WILL NEED TO COME BACK THROUGH FOR A FINAL PLAN, APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMITS BEFORE THEY CAN GET GOING ON CONSTRUCTION AND THE SECTION OF 91ST STREET NEEDS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND IMPROVED ALL THE WAY TO THIS EXISTING ROUNDABOUT.

THIS IS JUST AGAIN, JUST SOUTH OF LIFETIME FITNESS.

THIS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE THIRD BUILDING IN PHASE ONE.

SO DEPENDING ON WHICH ONES THEY CONSTRUCT, IN WHICH ORDER THERE WILL BE THAT STREET CONNECTION.

AND AGAIN, AS TIM MENTIONED, IT'S DUE TO FIRE ACCESS REQUIREMENTS FOR A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF UNITS.

AND THIS PORTION OF 93RD STREET IS ALREADY CONSTRUCTED, SO THEY WILL TIE INTO THAT HERE WHEN THEY GO UP AND DO 93RD STREET.

PHASE TWO IS ANTICIPATED TO START IN JUNE OF 2026.

AND WITH THAT, STAFF IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION DO RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THE REZONING FROM AG AND R1 TO P3 AND P4 AND THE PRELIMINARY PLAN PLAT FOR THIS MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT CONTAINS 374 APARTMENTS AND 90 TOWNHOMES CALLED ROSS CANYON HERE AT 93RD AND MILL CREEK AND RENNER.

AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

OTHER QUESTIONS MELANIE.

YES. SO I JUST WANTED TO START OFF BY SAYING, JUST THANK YOU FOR BEING SO FLEXIBLE AND WORKING WITH THE COMMUNITY.

THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO US.

AND OF COURSE, WORKING WITH THE CITY TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS.

IT REALLY IT REALLY DOES SHOW THE CONSIDERATION FOR THE PUBLIC.

ANOTHER QUESTION WAS CHRIS ASKED ABOUT THE PRICE RANGE FOR THE APARTMENTS.

WHAT ABOUT FOR THE TOWNHOMES? THE TOWNHOMES. SO WE USED THE FAIRWAYS AS A AS AN INITIAL STARTING POINT.

BUT WE'RE GOING TO BE WELL BELOW THEM BECAUSE THEY'RE GETTING UPWARDS TO $37,800 A MONTH PER SIDE PER UNIT ON THERE.

[01:10:08]

AND THAT'S PRETTY RICH.

SO WE'RE GOING TO BE WE'RE DIALING THAT THING BACK DOWN.

SO WE'RE GOING TO BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 26 TO 3100, DEPENDING ON IF IT'S A THREE BEDROOM TO A FIVE BEDROOM.

OKAY. AND THEN I WAS CURIOUS ABOUT THE CORNER BALCONIES THAT YOU WERE SHOWING US A WHILE AGO.

IS THAT A SHARED AMENITY? YEAH, THAT WILL BE A SHARED AMENITY.

OKAY. YEP.

THAT'LL BE OUR SKY LOUNGE RIGHT THERE.

OH, WOW. OKAY.

YEAH. NO, THANK YOU FOR SHARING THAT AND CLARIFYING.

YEP. OTHER QUESTIONS.

COURT. OKAY, EXPLAIN THAT AGAIN.

THE SHARED AMENITY.

THE COOL GEOMETRIC SHAPE.

NO. LIKE THE CORNER BALCONIES? YES. SO THAT IS A THE VERY TOP ONE.

OKAY. WITH THE COOL, YOU KNOW, GEOMETRIC ROOFLINE.

RIGHT. THAT IS GOING TO BE A SHARED AMENITY CLUB LOUNGE, IF YOU WILL.

OKAY. JUST KIND OF A HANGOUT SPOT FOR FOLKS.

AND THAT'S ON ALL THE FLOORS OR JUST THE TOP FLOOR? JUST THE TOP FLOOR OF THAT ONE.

OKAY. OF THAT ONE BUILDING.

YEAH. AND WE'LL HAVE WE'LL HAVE A CLUBHOUSE TOO.

SO WE'LL HAVE ACTUALLY HAVE A WHOLE LEASING CENTER THE GYM, THE KITCHEN AND ALL THE THINGS THAT YOU TYPICALLY SEE IN A MARKET RATE APARTMENT.

BUT WE JUST WANTED TO CREATE SOME DIFFERENT FOOT TRAFFIC THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY AND ALSO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT VIEW LOOKING WEST.

SO AND OF THE TOWNHOUSES, THERE WAS 90, 95, 95.

AND HOW MANY OF THEM ARE HOW MANY BEDROOMS? LIKE YOU SAID, WE HAVEN'T WE HAVEN'T WORKED THROUGH ALL THE DETAILS OF THAT YET, BUT THEY'RE GOING TO BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN THREE, FOUR AND FIVE BEDROOM TOWNHOMES WITH TWO CAR ATTACHED GARAGES.

I LOVE THAT. THANK YOU.

YOU'RE WELCOME. LIKE WE DON'T HAVE THAT.

WE HAVE ONE AND TWO BEDROOM APARTMENTS.

YEAH. AND YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE A COUPLE OF KIDS AND YOU WANT TO LIVE IN A TOWNHOUSE.

THERE'S NOT ENOUGH HOUSING IN THAT SPACE, SO.

ABSOLUTELY. AND THEN TO ADD TO THAT, WE WILL USE THE TOPOGRAPHY AGAIN TO OUR ADVANTAGE.

SO SOME OF THOSE WILL ACTUALLY HAVE IT'LL FEEL THREE STORY BECAUSE IT'LL HAVE THE WALKOUT BASEMENT.

BUT THAT WILL LIKELY BE WHERE ADDITIONAL LIVING SPACE OR THE FOURTH AND FIFTH BEDROOM WILL BE AT TWO.

OKAY, CHELSEA.

I'M SORRY. I JUST WANTED TO ECHO WHAT A LOT OF MY COLLEAGUES SAID ABOUT WORKING WITH THE COMMUNITY AND THE STAFF. IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU REALLY WENT ABOVE AND BEYOND MAKING SOME FAIRLY DRASTIC CHANGES.

WHEN I'M LOOKING AT THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL VERSUS WHAT YOU REVISED, IT'S IMPRESSIVE.

AND BEING ABLE TO CONSTRUCT AND DESIGN SOMETHING ON SUCH AN ODD PIECE OF LAND WITH THE TOPOGRAPHY AND THE AND THE STREAM CORRIDOR.

YOU KNOW, I THINK YOU DID AN EXCELLENT JOB IN REALLY WORKING AROUND WHAT YOU HAD.

OBVIOUSLY, IT'S A DIFFICULT PIECE OF LAND.

OTHERWISE IT, YOU KNOW, WOULD HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED BEFORE 1983.

SO I REALLY AM IMPRESSED WITH WHAT YOU'VE DONE.

I ALSO WILL SAY THAT I WAS UNEASY ABOUT SOME OF THE ARCHITECTURE WITH WHAT HAD BEEN INCLUDED IN THE PACKET.

I WASN'T REALLY SOLD ON SOME OF THE DESIGN ELEMENTS AND SOME OF THE COLORS.

BUT YOUR PRESENTATION AND YOUR SLIDES, I THINK REALLY BROUGHT IT OUT.

AND I, I FINALLY SAW THE CONNECTION WITH THE NATURE AND WITH THE THEMES OF SPRING AND AUTUMN AND THE COLORS, AND IT JUST IT REALLY CAME TOGETHER FOR ME.

SO I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THAT BECAUSE I WAS A LITTLE UNEASY ABOUT IT COMING IN TONIGHT, SO.

THANK YOU. SURE. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY.

THANK YOU FOR THE FEEDBACK.

OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU GUYS.

AND WE HAVE EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS.

THERE WAS A COUPLE OF EMAILS THAT WERE DISTRIBUTED TO EVERYONE.

CAME IN LATE LAST WEEK AND THEN WERE DISTRIBUTED TODAY.

DID ANYONE ELSE HAVE CONVERSATIONS WITH RESIDENTS BEFORE WE GET STARTED? NO. OKAY.

ANY OTHER THOUGHTS ON GOLDEN? OKAY. I WOULD ALSO JUST ADD THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE RESPONSIVENESS.

I THINK AS FAR AS YOU KNOW, THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, YOU'RE DOING A PRETTY REMARKABLE JOB AT FITTING THIS IN BETWEEN, AS YOU SAID, SORT OF THAT STEPPED APPROACH TO SORT OF THE LOWER HEIGHT, LOWER DENSITY, UP TO THE HIGH DENSITY AND CREATING SORT OF A GOOD MIDDLE OF THE SANDWICH BETWEEN THE R1 AND

[01:15:01]

THE P5.

SO THANK YOU FOR ALL OF THAT DILIGENCE.

WE CAN SEE THE OBVIOUSLY, AS CHELSEA MENTIONED, THE QUALITY OF THE DESIGN.

THAT IS A TESTAMENT TO OUR PROCESS HERE IN LENEXA THAT WE DRIVE TOWARDS QUALITY.

AND WE REALLY WANT TO THANK YOU FOR BEING RESPONSIVE IN THAT WAY.

AND I THINK THAT WE HAVE AN END PRODUCT HERE THAT WILL BE VERY DESIRABLE.

YOU KNOW, HIGH QUALITY TYPE DEVELOPMENT.

SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE HARD WORK.

WITH THAT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO PASS THE ORDINANCE, REZONING THE PROPERTY FROM RG AND RG AND R1 TO P3 AND P4.

SECOND MOTION BY CHELSEA, A SECOND BY CRAIG.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

MOTION PASSES AND WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE COMPANION PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR ROSS CANYON.

SO MOVED. SECOND.

MOTION BY MELANIE. SECOND BY CHELSEA.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ITEM 13 IS THE CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PLAT AND ACCEPTANCE OF DRAINAGE, UTILITY LANDSCAPE AND SIDEWALK EASEMENTS, AND RIGHT OF WAY, AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT OF

[13. Consideration of a preliminary plan/plat and acceptance of drainage, utility, landscape, and sidewalk easements and right-of-way as shown on the final plat of Wheatley Point West on property located at the northwest corner of 99th Street & Clare Road]

WHEATLEY POINT WEST ON A PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST NORTHWEST CORNER OF 99TH STREET AND CLARE ROAD.

ITEM 13 A IS APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS WHEATLEY POINT WEST.

ITEM 13 B IS ACCEPTANCE OF DRAINAGE, UTILITY LANDSCAPE AND SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN ON WHEATLEY POINT WEST FINAL PLAT.

THAT WAS A LOT.

THAT WAS A LOT. I'LL JUST SAY WHAT THE MAYOR SAID.

ITEM 13 IS MENTIONED IS FOR WHEATLEY POINT WEST.

THIS ONE IS A LITTLE BIT UNIQUE BECAUSE USUALLY YOU WOULD JUST SEE A FINAL PLAT ON YOUR CONSENT AGENDA.

BUT SINCE WE ARE ALSO INCLUDING THE PRELIMINARY PLAN COMPONENT TO THIS, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE TO FULLY EXPLAIN SORT OF WHY THIS ONE'S A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT.

THIS IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 99TH STREET AND CLARE ROAD.

SO JUST A QUICK BACKSTORY BEFORE WE GET INTO ALL THE GRAPHICS THAT GO ALONG WITH THIS AND TO EXPLAIN IT TO YOU.

THIS IS BEFORE YOU.

IN PRELIMINARY PLAN PLAT AND FINAL PLAT STAGE PACKAGED TOGETHER.

BASICALLY BECAUSE THIS HAD A PRELIMINARY PLAN THAT ACTUALLY EXPIRED ABOUT 6 OR 8 MONTHS AGO.

AND SO WE NEEDED TO RENEW THAT PLAN.

BUT AT THE SAME TIME THEIR PRELIMINARY PLAN AND THEIR FINAL PLAT ARE BASICALLY THE SAME AT THIS POINT.

SO WE DIDN'T WANT TO BELABOR THE PROCESS, MAKE IT MORE COMPLICATED, MAKE THEM DO AN EXTRA STOP AT PLANNING COMMISSION BEFORE COMING BACK.

AND IT'S A RELATIVELY SMALL SUBDIVISION.

SO IN THE SPIRIT OF OUR BUSINESS FRIENDLY AND DEVELOPMENT FRIENDLY PRACTICES HERE IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, WE WANTED TO PACKAGE IT TOGETHER, BRING IT FORWARD TO YOU ALL AT ONCE, AND LET YOU KNOW WHAT THE CURRENT PLAN IS FOR THIS PARTICULAR PIECE, AND SEE IT MOVING FORWARD AFTER A COUPLE OF YEARS HERE.

SO THIS PROJECT, LIKE I MENTIONED, IS AROUND 99TH AND CLARE, WHICH IS A CONSTRUCTION SITE AT CURRENT.

AND BOTH OF THOSE ROADS ARE BEING IMPROVED AND WILL HOPEFULLY OPEN PRETTY SOON.

TIM'S NODDING. SO LOOK FORWARD TO THAT AS WELL.

JUST IN TIME TO GET SOME MORE CONSTRUCTION GOING ON THIS SITE.

AND LOCATED HERE IN SORT OF THE SOUTHWEST AREA OF LENEXA.

THIS IS THE SUBJECT SITE.

BELIEVE IT OR NOT, THERE ARE STREETS HERE NOW.

DON'T DRIVE ON THEM QUITE YET, BUT THEY'RE THERE.

AND THE SITE IS IN THIS RED POLYGON SHAPE HERE.

AND IF YOU WERE ON COUNCIL A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO WHEN THIS ORIGINALLY CAME THROUGH FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAN, YOU MAY REMEMBER SOME FACTS ABOUT THIS SITE.

AND I'M SORRY, I DON'T KNOW WHY THAT GOT STUCK OVER THERE.

THE SITE IS ZONED RP TWO AND AROUND IT WE HAVE SOME OTHER RESIDENTIAL AREAS.

AND JUST TO THE SOUTH OF 99TH STREET WE HAVE THE CEDAR CANYON WEST DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IF YOU RECALL, INCLUDES A MYRIAD OF DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICTS AND SEVEN DIFFERENT TRACKS OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, SOME OF WHICH IS CURRENTLY UNDERWAY.

THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP CALLS FOR MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IN THIS AREA, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING AND THE PLAN AND PLAT BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING WITH THIS APPLICATION.

SO HERE IS THE COMPARISON OF THE ORIGINAL 2022 PRELIMINARY PLAN AND THIS PARTICULAR APPLICATION THIS EVENING.

VERY, VERY SIMILAR.

THEY'RE JUST LOOKING TO RE-ENERGIZE THIS PROJECT AND GET SOME DEVELOPMENT GOING HERE, ESPECIALLY NOW THAT THE STREETS ARE ALMOST COMPLETED.

THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO IS THAT NOW WE'VE REQUESTED THAT THAT SIDEWALK CONNECTION BE WITHIN A TRACT RATHER THAN BEING AN EASEMENT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. AND WE'VE FOUND THAT BY HAVING IT BE IN A TRACT IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT CAN ACCIDENTALLY GET FENCED IN OR OBJECTED TO BY A PRIVATE PROPERTY

[01:20:07]

OWNER THAT OWNS THAT AND DOESN'T WANT TO SEE A SIDEWALK THROUGH WHAT THEY BELIEVE IS THEIR BACKYARD.

SO IT JUST MAKES IT EASIER FOR A LOT OF REASONS ACCESS, MAINTENANCE AND ACTUALLY MAKING SURE THIS CONNECTION GETS DONE.

SO THAT'S THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PREVIOUS EXPIRED PLAN AND WHAT YOU SEE BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING.

AND THEN THIS IS THE COLORFUL GRAPHIC THAT YOU USUALLY SEE IN YOUR PACKET ON CONSENT ITEMS THAT SHOWS YOU ALL OF THE DIFFERENT DEDICATIONS THAT ARE REQUESTED WITH THIS. REALLY QUICK, BEFORE I GO OVER THESE, I DO WANT TO POINT OUT JUST A COUPLE QUICK FACTS ABOUT THE PROJECT.

THIS IS 22 DWELLING UNITS.

SO THESE ARE DUPLEX UNITS.

IT'LL BE 11 LOTS, THREE TRACKS, AND IT'S ABOUT 9.5 ACRES TOTAL.

SO THAT IS THE SCOPE OF WHAT IS ON THE PLAN AND THE DEDICATIONS YOU SEE HERE NOW IN THE BROWN.

IT'S RIGHT OF WAY.

AND YOU CAN SEE THAT'LL BE FOR BOTH CLARE AND 99TH AND THEN THE INTERNAL ACCESS IN THE CUL DE SACS THERE WILL ALL BE PUBLIC STREETS. THERE'S A LANDSCAPE EASEMENT FOR SOME BUFFERING ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY IN THE GREEN THERE.

THERE ARE A FEW DRAINAGE EASEMENTS THROUGHOUT THE LOTS IN BLUE UTILITY EASEMENTS AROUND THE RIGHT OF WAY WITHIN THE CUL DE SACS.

AND THAT SIDEWALK THAT WE TALKED ABOUT THAT IS WITHIN THE TRACK.

SO IT'S STILL AN EASEMENT, BUT IT'S WITHIN THE TRACT, NOT WITHIN THOSE PRIVATE PROPERTY LINES.

SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR WITH THE PLAT DEDICATION.

AND STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PLAT FOR THE 11 DUPLEX LOTS, WHICH ARE 22 DWELLING UNITS.

THE FINAL PLAT FOR THE LOTS, THREE TRACKS, EASEMENTS AND DEDICATIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY.

AND AGAIN, THIS IS FOR WHEATLEY POINTE WEST AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 99TH AND CLARE.

AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION ON THIS ITEM.

YES, STEPHANIE.

CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE PLANS? SURE. BACK TO BACK.

SO DOWN HERE ON THE BOTTOM, THE TRACK THAT'S ON THE OTHER SIDE.

IS THAT NOT.

THAT'S THE SAME DEVELOPMENT, RIGHT? THIS LIKE FROM THE WHERE THE HOUSES STOP OR IS IT LIKE OR IS IT SOUTH OF OR IS THAT SOUTH.

NO. TO THE RIGHT. THAT PART.

YEAH. YES.

THIS IS A DETENTION AREA.

OKAY. THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. IT JUST DIDN'T HAVE THE SAME LINES ON THE OTHER SIDE.

I WAS LIKE, WHERE'S THE DRAINAGE GOING? AS I WAS TRYING TO PIECE IT ALL TOGETHER.

YEAH, THEY WANTED TO KNOW THE SAME SHAPE ISN'T ON THERE FOR WHATEVER REASON, BUT THAT IS RESERVED FOR DRAINAGE.

PERFECT. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY.

THANK YOU. OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. WITH THAT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS WHEATLEY POINT WEST.

SECOND. MOTION BY COURTNEY.

SECOND BY MELANIE. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE DRAINAGE UTILITY LANDSCAPE AND SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAY SHOWN IN THE WHEATLEY POINT WEST FINAL PLAT.

PLOT. MOTION BY CRAIG, SECOND BY MARK.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. MOTION PASSES.

THANK YOU. STEPHANIE. THANK YOU.

NEW BUSINESS TONIGHT.

NUMBER 14 IS AN APPROVAL.

THANK YOU FOR WAITING, ELLEN.

ITEM NUMBER 14 IS AN APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT WITH FINKLE WILLIAMS INCORPORATED FOR ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE LENEXA FIRE STATION NUMBER SIX AND LIVEWELL

[14. Approval of an agreement with Finkle-Williams, Inc. for architectural and engineering services for the Lenexa Fire Station #6 and LiveWell Health Center Project]

HEALTH CENTER PROJECT.

TODD. THANK YOU.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

WE I THINK WE RECENTLY DISCUSSED THIS AT OUR CIP RECOMMENDATION, BUT I'LL QUICKLY GO OVER THIS.

WE'RE EXCITED TO BRING FORWARD A STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR TWO COMPONENTS.

ONE, THE LIVEWELL HEALTH CLINIC, RELOCATION FROM THE OLD CITY HALL INTO THIS BUILDING UP ON THE SECOND FLOOR.

AND THEN THE SECOND PHASE OF THIS IS THE STUDY OF THE FIRE STATION NUMBER SIX, WHICH WE ARE PROPOSING TO LOCATE AT THE OLD CITY HALL SITE.

SO THERE'S TWO PHASES TO THIS, AND WE'VE NEGOTIATED A FIXED FEE WITH FINKLE WILLIAMS, WHO'S HERE TONIGHT.

THIS IS ELLEN FOSTER, OUR PROJECT MANAGER, WHO I KNOW VERY WELL AND HAVE SPENT A LOT OF TIME WITH OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS, SO WE'RE EXCITED TO RECOMMEND THEM.

WE HAD 1010 SUBMITTALS FOR, SO WE HAD VERY GOOD INTEREST IN THIS PROJECT.

WE SHORTLISTED TO FOUR FIRMS WHERE WE DID A PRETTY SUBSTANTIAL INTERVIEW PROCESS.

WE WERE PLEASED TO SAY THAT WE COULD RECOMMEND A LOCAL LENEXA BASED COMPANY.