10. Ordinance approving a 10-year special use permit for a personal instruction, general use known as MAVS located at 16501 W. 116th Street, in the BP-2, Planned Manufacturing District

[10. Ordinance approving a 10-year special use permit for a personal instruction, general use known as MAVS located at 16501 W. 116th Street, in the BP-2, Planned Manufacturing District]

GENERAL USE AS KNOWN AS MAVS, LOCATED AT 16501 WEST 116TH STREET IN THE BP-2 PLANNED MANUFACTURING DISTRICT, STEPHANIE.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

STEPHANIE KISLER, PLANNING MANAGER IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR MAVS.

THEY'RE LOCATED AT 16501 116 STREET, AND THEY'RE SEEKING A RENEWAL FOR TEN YEARS FOR THEIR SPECIAL USE PERMIT.

ON THE SCREEN NOW, YOU'LL SEE THE LOCATION MAP.

AND THE TENANT SPACE IS APPROXIMATELY 70,000FT² OF THIS INDUSTRIAL BUILDING.

AND THEIR TENANT SPACE IS OUTLINED IN THIS RED DASHED LINE.

YOU SEE WHERE I'M POINTING THE MOUSE? AND THEY HAVE PARKING AGREEMENTS WITH SOME OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.

WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT HERE IN A SECOND.

BUT YOU CAN SEE THIS AERIAL WAS TAKEN DURING A TIME WHEN THERE WAS SOME VOLLEYBALL HAPPENING IN THERE WITH THE CARS IN THIS AERIAL IMAGE.

[00:05:01]

THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY IS BP-2.

AS YOU CAN SEE IN PURPLE HERE, THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CLASSIFIES THIS AREA AS BUSINESS PARK, SO THE LAND USE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ZONING.

I HAVE SOME PHOTOS OF THE TENANT SPACE.

YOU CAN SEE HERE THE SIGN ON THE WEST FACE OF THE BUILDING.

THIS IS THE NORTH FACE OF THE BUILDING.

SO THIS IS THE SIDE THAT FACES 116TH STREET.

AND I HAVE THE FLOOR PLAN FOR YOU HERE THAT SHOWS THE LAYOUT INSIDE THAT TENANT SPACE WITH ALL OF THE DIFFERENT VOLLEYBALL COURTS.

JUST TO GIVE YOU AN OVERVIEW OF THE OPERATIONS, THE APPLICANT LET US KNOW THAT THROUGHOUT THE YEAR IT HAS NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS.

AND SOMETIMES IN THE EVENINGS IT EXTENDS TO 10 P.M.

DURING THE CLUB SEASON, WHICH IS NOVEMBER THROUGH JUNE.

THEY HOST APPROXIMATELY THREE TOURNAMENTS PER MONTH FROM JANUARY TO MARCH, AND A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS REQUIRED BECAUSE THE FACILITY IS LARGER THAN 5,000FT² BY ABOUT 65,000FT² IN THIS CASE, SO WE REQUIRE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THIS INTENSITY OF A PERSONAL INSTRUCTION USE.

SO THAT'S WHAT WE CLASSIFY THIS PARTICULAR USE AS.

AND GENERALLY WITH THE PERSONAL INSTRUCTION USE OF A SIZE GREATER THAN 5,000FT², WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THINGS LIKE PARKING AND TIMING AND THE ADJACENT TENANTS AND HOW THOSE RELATIONSHIPS WORK TOGETHER.

SO IN THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE WE DID REVIEW THE SPECIAL USE CRITERIA THAT YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN.

THOSE RESPONSES FROM STAFF ARE DETAILED IN OUR STAFF REPORT IN DETAIL.

I'M HAPPY TO GO INTO MORE DETAIL WITH ANY OF THEM DIRECTLY IF YOU WOULD LIKE.

AS MENTIONED, OPERATING HOURS AND PARKING ARE TWO OF THE THINGS THAT WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT SPECIFICALLY WITH THIS PARTICULAR REQUEST.

AND I WILL NOTE AGAIN THAT THIS IS A RENEWAL FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT.

SO THE APPLICANT IS IN HERE TO RENEW A SPECIAL USE PERMIT THAT WAS GRANTED IN THE PAST.

OPERATING HOURS AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE TOP TABLE, THERE ARE NORMAL 8 TO 5 LIKE I MENTIONED DURING THE CLUB SEASON, HAVING IT OPEN A LITTLE BIT LATER, NOVEMBER THROUGH JUNE TO 10 P.M.

SATURDAY TOURNAMENTS ARE 8 TO 7 AND SUNDAY TOURNAMENTS 8 TO 4, SO YOU CAN ALSO SEE THE PROJECTED OCCUPANTS OR VEHICLES JUST BASED ON NORMAL CLUB SATURDAY AND SUNDAY.

PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE 110 SPACES FOR GENERALLY WHAT THEY'RE DOING ON THE WEEKDAYS AND EVENINGS, AND THE PROVIDED PARKING THROUGHOUT THE SITE AND PARKING AGREEMENTS IS 453 SPACES.

AND THEN FOR WHAT WE CONSIDER ENTERTAINMENT INDOOR, WHICH WOULD BE TOURNAMENTS WITH, YOU KNOW, PARTICIPANTS AND SPECTATORS, THE REQUIREMENTS 350 SPACES AND THEY'RE PROVIDING 611 WITH THOSE ADJACENT PARKING AGREEMENTS.

HERE'S A GREAT GRAPHIC THAT SHOWS EXACTLY WHERE THAT PARKING IS OCCURRING.

SO IN THE YELLOW.

THIS IS ALL OF THE ON SITE PARKING.

AND YOU CAN SEE JUST BECAUSE OF THE INDUSTRIAL NATURE OF THIS BUILDING AND THE OTHER TENANTS IN THE BUILDING, THERE'S SOME COMPATIBILITY WITH JUST OFF HOURS AND BUSINESS OPERATION HOURS. SO DURING THOSE EVENING TIMES WHEN THESE BUSINESSES ARE NOT OPERATING, THERE IS AVAILABILITY FOR MORE OF THIS PARKING, AND FOR WEEKEND OVERFLOW THERE ARE THOSE SHARED PARKING AGREEMENTS TO THE NORTH HERE IN THOSE BLUE ZONES.

AND AS PART OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN THE PAST, THE APPLICANT ACTUALLY WORKED WITH THE CITY TO MAKE SOME IMPROVEMENTS.

SO THERE'S A CROSSWALK HERE FOR SAFETY PURPOSES.

AND WITH THAT, STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A PERIOD OF TEN YEARS.

THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU. QUESTIONS FOR STEPHANIE.

GO AHEAD BILL. STEPHANIE, YOU SAID IT'S A RENEWAL.

HOW LONG HAVE THEY BEEN DOING THIS? SURE. SO THE PREVIOUS APPROVALS INCLUDE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FROM 2013.

THAT WAS THEIR FIRST SPECIAL USE PERMIT.

AND THAT WAS AT THEIR PREVIOUS LOCATION ON 108TH STREET.

THE INITIAL SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR THIS LOCATION ON 116TH STREET WAS IN 2020.

AND THEN IF YOU RECALL, THEY CAME BACK IN 2021 TO MODIFY THAT 2020 SPECIAL USE PERMIT BECAUSE OF COVID.

AND SORT OF THEY THEY OPENED THE FLOODGATE A LITTLE BIT IF YOU WILL, BECAUSE OF COVID RESTRICTIONS LESSENING.

YEAH, IT SEEMED LIKE THEY'D BEEN BEFORE US A FEW TIMES.

AND IT'S SUCH A GREAT FACILITY AND SUCH A GREAT SITE AND PROVIDES SO MUCH GOOD.

[00:10:02]

AND I'M ESPECIALLY HAPPY THAT ALL THOSE ADDITIONAL PARKING AGREEMENTS THAT THEY WORKED THROUGH WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS AND WITH US SEEM TO BE WORKING JUST FINE.

SO THIS IS A NICE JOB.

THANK YOU.

IS THE APPLICANT HERE? DID THEY WANT TO ADD ANYTHING? DID YOU GUYS WANT TO ADD ANYTHING? NO. IT'S BEEN GREAT.

OKAY. YEAH, I WOULD AGREE WITH BILL.

YOU KNOW, WE WOULD HEAR ABOUT IT IF THERE WAS SOMETHING GOING WRONG AND WE'VE NOT HEARD A PEEP.

SO THANK YOU FOR OPERATING A GOOD BUSINESS AND WHAT YOU DO IN LENEXA.

OKAY. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO PASS THE ORDINANCE APPROVING A TEN YEAR SPECIAL SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR PERSONAL INSTRUCTION FOR MAVS LOCATED AT 16501 WEST 116TH 116TH STREET.

SO MOVED. OKAY.

COURTNEY HAS NO VOICE, BUT I SAW HER LIPS MOVING.

MOTION BY COURTNEY, SECOND BY MARK.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. MOTION IS APPROVED.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ITEM 11 IS AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FIVE YEAR SPECIAL PERMIT.

[11. Ordinance approving a five-year special use permit for a medical clinic use known as Tarry Chiropractic located at 13000 W. 87th Street Parkway, Suite 105, in the NP-O, Planned Neighborhood Office District]

SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A MEDICAL CLINIC KNOWN AS TARRY CHIROPRACTIC, LOCATED AT 13000 WEST WEST 87TH STREET, SUITE 105, IN THE NPO PLANNED NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE DISTRICT, STEPHANIE.

THANK YOU AGAIN MAYOR AND COUNCIL STEPHANIE KISLER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

AND AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A MEDICAL CLINIC IN THE NPO ZONING DISTRICT.

SPECIFICALLY AT 13000 87TH STREET PARKWAY IN SUITE 105.

THIS IS THE LOCATION SO YOU CAN SEE IT IS NORTH OF 87TH STREET AND JUST WEST OF ROSE HILL ROAD.

AND THE TENANT SPACE IS IN THIS GENERAL AREA OF THE RED STAR HERE.

AND THE PARCEL OUTLINE OF THE PROPERTY IS IN RED.

YOU CAN SEE THIS PARTICULAR BUILDING IS SITUATED TO THE NORTH OF THE LARGER STRIP CENTER IN THIS PARTICULAR COMMERCIAL AREA.

AS MENTIONED, THE SITE IS ZONED NPO, WHICH IS A LESS INTENSE OFFICE USE DISTRICT.

THAT'S GENERALLY SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD LOOK AT TRANSITIONING A MORE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TOWARD A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WHICH YOU CAN SEE SANDWICHED HERE NICELY IN THE BLUE BETWEEN OUR COMMERCIAL CP-1 AND OUR R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INDICATES OFFICE AND EMPLOYMENT USES IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA, WHICH DOES MATCH THE ZONING OF NPO.

THERE'S ALSO NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL IN THE RED TO THE SOUTH AND SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL TO THE NORTH.

SO EVERYTHING ALIGNS WITH THE ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA.

HERE IS A PHOTO OF THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING.

IT IS A ONE STORY OFFICE BUILDING AND THERE ARE MULTIPLE TENANTS.

AS WITH THE PREVIOUS SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WE DO REVIEW THESE 13 CRITERIA IN DEPTH AND THE STAFF REPORT AT PLANNING COMMISSION STAGE, AND I'M HAPPY TO GO OVER ANY OF THESE RESPONSES IN MORE DETAIL IF YOU'D LIKE.

AND I DO WANT TO NOTE BEFORE GETTING INTO THE RECOMMENDATION SLIDE HERE, THAT THIS IS JUST A 518 SQUARE FOOT TENANT SPACE.

AND BECAUSE OUR CODE REQUIRES A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR MEDICAL AND NPO ZONING DISTRICT, THAT'S WHY YOU SEE THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BEFORE YOU TODAY.

THE APPLICANT MAY WANT TO GO INTO THIS IN MORE DETAIL, BUT I WILL ALSO NOTE THAT GENERALLY THIS IS A LOW VOLUME CLINIC AND STAFF DID NOT HAVE ANY CONCERNS WITH TRAFFIC, PARKING HOURS OF OPERATION, OR COMPATIBILITY WITH OTHER TENANTS IN THIS AREA.

AND WITH THAT, STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A MEDICAL CLINIC USE FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS.

AND THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT.

QUESTIONS ON THIS ONE, JOE? NOT A QUESTION PER SE ON THIS, BECAUSE I THINK THIS MAKES A LOT OF SENSE.

BUT DURING A PREVIOUS APPLICATION, WE HAD TALKED ABOUT THE PRIVATE ROAD THAT IS IN IN FRONT OF THAT AND THE FACT THAT WE WERE GOING TO TALK HOPEFULLY WITH THE OWNER TO SEE ABOUT IMPROVEMENTS.

DO YOU HAVE AN UPDATE ON THAT? SO STAFF HAS BEEN CONTINUING TO WORK THROUGH THAT WITH OUR COMMUNITY STANDARDS DIVISION, AND I BELIEVE THEY HAVE CONTACT WITH THE OWNER AND SOME PROGRESS BEING MADE.

I KNOW AT LEAST ONE OF THE PARKING LOTS IN THAT AREA HAS BEEN RESURFACED.

AND I APOLOGIZE, I DIDN'T GET A CHANCE TO GO BY THE SITE TODAY TO SEE IF THERE WAS ANY FURTHER PROGRESS ON THAT RING ROAD.

BUT IT DOES SOUND LIKE IT'S IN PROGRESS OKAY. THANK YOU.

OKAY. DO WE HAVE THIS APPLICANT? WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADD ANYTHING? NOTHING TO ADD. JUST THANKS FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

OF COURSE. THANK YOU SIR.

OKAY. WITH THAT, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO PASS THE ORDINANCE APPROVING A FIVE YEAR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR MEDICAL CLINIC KNOWN AS TARRY CHIROPRACTIC, LOCATED AT

[00:15:06]

13000 WEST 87TH STREET PARKWAY, SUITE 105.

MOTION BY CRAIG SECOND BY JOE.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. MOTION PASSES.

WELCOME TO LENEXA.

ITEM 12 IS AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FIVE YEAR SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A MEDICAL CLINIC AND PERSONAL SERVICES BUSINESS KNOWN AS EVOLUTION YOU.

[12. Ordinance approving a five-year special use permit for a medical clinic and personal services business known as Evolution You located at 13626 W. 95th Street, in the NP-O, Planned Neighborhood Office District]

LOCATED AT 13626 WEST 95TH STREET IN THE NPO PLANNED NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE DISTRICT ONE MORE.

GOT A FEW MORE FOR YOU. OKAY.

BUT THANK YOU AGAIN.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL, STEPHANIE KISLER WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR EVOLUTION YOU.

AND THIS IS LOCATED AT 13626 95TH STREET IN THE NPO ZONING DISTRICT.

SO MUCH LIKE OUR LAST PROPOSAL, THIS IS ANOTHER ONE THAT'S ZONED IN THAT NPO DISTRICT AND REQUIRES A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PROPOSED USES.

IN THIS CASE, ON THE LOCATION MAP, YOU CAN SEE 95TH STREET TO THE SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY AND PFLUMM JUST TO THE EAST.

THIS PARTICULAR TENANT SPACE IS LOCATED IN THE WEST BUILDING, IN THIS COMMERCIAL CENTER, GENERALLY WHERE THE RED STAR IS LOCATED.

THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY IS MENTIONED IS NPO, THAT LOW INTENSITY OFFICE TYPE USE, AND IT'S SURROUNDED BY R-1 TO THE NORTH.

THERE'S A LITTLE BIT MORE NPO TO THE EAST HERE.

YOU CAN SEE IN THAT BLUE COLOR AND MORE R-1 TO BOTH THE EAST AND THE SOUTH OF 95TH STREET THERE.

SO BP-1 FURTHER SOUTH IN THIS PINKISH PURPLE COLOR.

THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS FUTURE LAND USE MAP SHOWS THIS AREA AS OFFICE, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE USE AND THE ZONING IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE.

HERE IS A VIEW OF THE EXTERIOR.

THIS IS WHAT YOU WOULD SEE WHEN YOU'RE DRIVING IN.

THERE'S A BIT OF A GRADE CHANGE HERE AS YOU GO UP INTO THE COMMERCIAL CENTER.

AND THEN OUR TENANT SPACE IS LOCATED HERE.

THIS PARTICULAR TENANT SPACE IS 819FT² OF THIS PARTICULAR BUILDING.

SO IT'S A RELATIVELY SMALL SPACE, JUST LIKE OUR LAST PROPOSAL FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT.

AND YOU CAN SEE HERE THE SPECIFIC ENTRY FOR THE TENANT SPACE.

THERE WAS ONE ITEM THAT STAFF NOTED WHEN INSPECTING THE SITE.

AS WE DO OUR SPECIAL USE PERMIT EVALUATIONS AND REVIEWS, WE DO VISIT THE SITE.

WE DO LOOK FOR ANY COMPLIANCE ISSUES.

AND YOU MAY RECALL THERE WAS ONE OF THESE SIMILAR CASES BACK IN THE FALL WHERE WE IDENTIFIED THERE WAS SOME TRASH ENCLOSURE OR LANDSCAPING OR PARKING LOT PAVEMENT TYPE CODE ISSUES. SO AS PART OF THIS RECOMMENDATION, STAFF DOES WANT TO MAKE SURE THE APPLICANT COMPLETES SOME CODE COMPLIANCE ISSUES WITH THE DUMPSTER.

THERE'S A GATE REQUIREMENT SO THAT BASICALLY YOU'RE NOT SEEING THAT FORTH SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER IN THIS ENCLOSURE.

SO STAFF IS WORKING WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THE TENANT EVOLUTION YOU TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GET A GATE ADDED TO THIS THREE SIDED ENCLOSURE SO THAT IT IS FULLY ENCLOSED AND SCREENED FROM ALL SIDES.

AS WITH THE PREVIOUS SPECIAL USE PERMIT CASES I MENTIONED, WE REVIEW THESE 13 CRITERIA FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS, AND I'M HAPPY TO GO THROUGH THESE IN MORE DETAIL.

BUT THOSE RESPONSES ARE INCLUDED IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORTS.

AND STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A MEDICAL CLINIC AND PERSONAL SERVICES USE FOR EVOLUTION YOU FOR FIVE YEARS WITH THAT CONDITION RELATED TO THE CODE ISSUE FOR THE TRASH ENCLOSURE.

I DO WANT TO GIVE YOU A COUPLE MORE DETAILS ABOUT THE BUSINESS ITSELF TOO.

EVOLUTION YOU PROVIDES PRIMARY CARE SERVICES AND HEALTH COACHING.

SO IT WAS KIND OF A HYBRID OF MEDICAL USE AND PERSONAL SERVICES BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THE BUSINESS.

AND IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, STAFF ALSO DID NOT HAVE ANY ISSUE WITH THE PROJECTED QUANTITY OF PATIENTS OR THE PARKING.

THIS PARTICULAR COMMERCIAL CENTER SEEMS TO HAVE PLENTY OF PARKING FOR THE USERS WITHIN IT, AND THERE WOULD BE RELATIVELY LOW VOLUME OF CLIENTS AT THIS GIVEN TIME. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT ON THIS PARTICULAR SPECIAL USE PERMIT QUESTION.

WELL. YEAH.

BILL. YES.

STEPHANIE, YOU MENTIONED LAST FALL WE HAD THAT SUP WITH 95TH AND NOLAN.

HOW ARE WE DOING ON THOSE IMPROVEMENTS? I BELIEVE THE LAST TIME I CHECKED, THEY HAD DONE EVERYTHING.

AND MAYBE THE LAST ITEM WAS THE TRASH ENCLOSURE AND JUST RELOCATING THAT ON THE SITE.

[00:20:02]

THEY WERE LOOKING AT RELOCATING IT, AND THEN WINTER AND CONCRETE AND TEMPERATURE KIND OF SET THEM BACK FROM THEIR ORIGINAL PLAN.

BUT I CAN DEFINITELY CHECK ON THAT FOR YOU AND JUST ENSURE THAT LAST BOX WAS TICKED.

SO YOU'D EXPECT YOU'D WORK WITH THIS APPLICANT.

YES. ON THESE IMPROVEMENTS, JUST LIKE YOU DID THE LAST ONE.

CORRECT? GOOD.

YEAH. AND WE SET A SIMILAR TIMELINE FOR THIS 190 DAYS FROM POTENTIALLY, IF APPROVED THIS EVENING, IT WOULD BE 90 DAYS FROM THIS EVENING AND WEATHER WOULD BE ON OUR SIDE IN THIS CASE. GOOD.

YEAH. THANK YOU.

COURTNEY, DID YOU HAVE SOMETHING? [INAUDIBLE] ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO ADD ABOUT THE BUSINESS? CAN YOU COME DOWN TO THE MIC, PLEASE? CAN YOU CAN YOU COME DOWN HERE TO THE MICROPHONE, PLEASE? OH, SORRY.

OKAY. SORRY ABOUT THAT. I JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT I AM WORKING WITH MY LANDLORD AND THEY'VE ALREADY GOT BIDS OUT TO GET THE ENCLOSURE FIXED, SO THEY'RE WORKING REALLY CLOSE WITH ME TO GET THAT COMPLETED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

SO. OKAY, OKAY.

ANYTHING ELSE? OKAY.

ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO PASS THE ORDINANCE PROVING FIVE YEAR SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR MEDICAL CLINIC AND PERSONAL SERVICES, KNOWN AS EVOLUTION YOU, LOCATED AT 13626 WEST 95TH STREET IN NPO.

MOTION BY CHELSEA SECOND BY BILL.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

MOTION PASSES.

ITEM NUMBER 13 IS A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS OAK IQ COPPER CREEK, LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 89TH

[13. Approval of a preliminary plan/plat for a multifamily residential development known as Oak IQ Copper Creek located near the northwest corner of 89th Street & Woodsonia Drive within the RP-3, Residential Planned (Medium High-Density), RP-4, Residential Planned (High-Density), and RP-5, Residential Planned (High-Rise, High-Density) Districts]

STREET AND WOODSONIA DRIVE WITHIN THE RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, STEPHANIE.

THANK YOU AGAIN. MAYOR AND COUNCIL STEPHANIE KISLER WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

AND AS NOTED, THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR OAK IQ COPPER CREEK FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAN SLASH PLAT.

AND THIS IS LOCATED NEAR 89TH AND WOODSONIA DRIVE.

ON THE SCREEN NOW YOU CAN SEE THE LOCATION MAP K SEVEN HIGHWAY BORDERS THE SITE TO THE WEST WOODSONIA DRIVE BORDERS THE SITE TO THE EAST AND TO THE NORTH YOU HAVE WEST SIDE FAMILY CHURCH AND TO THE SOUTH THERE'S A LARGE LOT SINGLE FAMILY HOME.

ALSO TO THE EAST IS THE WATERCRESS LANDING SUBDIVISION.

THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY IS A MIXTURE OF RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5, AND THIS PROPERTY WAS REZONED IN 2021 AS PART OF A LARGER PROJECT.

YOU CAN SEE HERE THAT THAT ZONING IS WHAT WE LIKE TO THINK OF AS TIERED, SO THAT THE MOST DENSE IS ALONG K SEVEN AND THE LEAST DENSE AREA, ZONING WISE, IS ALONG WOODSONIA AS IT TRANSITIONS TOWARD THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RP-1 ZONED AREA AND WATERCRESS LANDING.

THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CALLS FOR OFFICE AND EMPLOYMENT CENTER HERE.

HOWEVER, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WILL BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THIS REZONING AND CONCEPT PLAN IN THE DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT WAS RELEASED.

SO THAT'S AVAILABLE ON THE WEBSITE, AND WE HOPE TO BRING THAT NEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FORWARD TO THE COUNCIL IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS.

THE SITE PLAN INCLUDES A TOTAL OF 529 DWELLING UNITS ACROSS TWO PHASES AND THREE ZONING DISTRICTS.

SO LET ME EXPLAIN THAT A LITTLE BIT SLOWER, BECAUSE I KNOW THAT'S A LOT OF MOVING PARTS.

SO IF YOU RECALL FROM OUR ZONING MAP, WE HAVE THE RP-3 IN THIS EAST AREA IN THE MIDDLE WE HAVE RP-4, WHICH IS A STEP MORE DENSE, AND THE RP-5 WHICH IS THE MOST DENSE.

AND THIS IS ALL MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

SO THERE ARE MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS PER BUILDING.

THE RP-3 AREA HAS FIVE BUILDINGS WITH 60 UNITS TOTAL, SO 12 UNITS PER BUILDING.

THE RP-4 AREA HAS SIX BUILDINGS IN THIS GOLD COLOR, AND THAT'S A TOTAL OF 234 UNITS SPREAD ACROSS THOSE SIX BUILDINGS.

AND THEN THE REMAINING 235 DWELLING UNITS ARE WITHIN THESE FOUR BUILDINGS IN THE DARKER ORANGE COLOR.

IF YOU'RE PAYING ATTENTION, YOU ALSO SAW THESE TWO LIGHT BLUE BUILDINGS HERE.

AND THOSE ARE THE CLUBHOUSES.

THERE ARE TWO CLUBHOUSES BECAUSE THERE ARE TWO PHASES.

SO THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A NORTH PHASE DIVIDED BY THIS NICE PURPLE LINE HERE AND A SOUTH PHASE.

SO AGAIN THREE DIFFERENT DENSITIES AND ZONING DISTRICTS AT PLAY HERE AND TWO DIFFERENT PHASES.

SO A LOT GOING ON HERE AS PART OF THE PLANS.

[00:25:01]

BUT THIS PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WAS IN THE CONCEPT PLAN AT THE TIME OF REZONING.

I ALSO WANT TO POINT OUT THE DIFFERENT ACCESS POINTS HERE.

SO THERE ARE FOUR ACCESS POINTS SHOWN ON TWO WOODSONIA DRIVE, AND I WANTED TO POINT OUT ONE WHERE THERE IS NOT AN ACCESS POINT.

AND THIS WAS DONE VERY INTENTIONALLY.

SO YOU CAN SEE HERE THIS IS 89TH STREET AND THIS IS A DIRECT CONNECTION OVER TOWARD BLACKHOOF PARK AND LAKE LENEXA. AND STAFF WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS WAS NOT A PRIMARY WAY TO CONNECT OVER TO MONTICELLO AND TO THE PARK.

WE DIDN'T WANT TO ENCOURAGE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC TO GO DOWN 89TH STREET.

SO SPECIFICALLY IN THIS INSTANCE, WE DID NOT REQUEST THAT THE APPLICANT PUT A CURB CUT AT THIS LOCATION.

IT WOULD JUST MAKE IT SLIGHTLY MORE DIFFICULT FOR SOMEONE TO USE THAT AS A CUT THROUGH BY PLACING THESE LOCATIONS FOR ACCESS IN OTHER AREAS, YOU CAN SEE THERE IS ACCESS ALIGNED WITH 88TH STREET AND THEN AT THESE TWO LOCATIONS TO THE NORTH, BUT THOSE ARE NOT EXACT THROUGH PATHS OVER TO MONTICELLO. SO WE BELIEVE THAT WHEN WOODSONIA DRIVE IS COMPLETED, BOTH TO THE NORTH SEGMENT THAT'S MISSING AND ALL THE WAY TO THE SOUTH TO PRAIRIE STAR PARKWAY, WHICH I'LL SHOW YOU A GRAPHIC ON THAT IN A MINUTE, THAT THOSE WOULD BE THE PRIMARY WAYS THAT PEOPLE WOULD GET OVER TO MONTICELLO.

ADDITIONALLY, WITH THE PROJECT ON THE AGENDA AFTER THIS ONE 86TH STREET WILL BE COMPLETED AS PART OF THAT PROJECT, AND THAT WILL BE A NEW PUBLIC STREET LINK RIGHT OVER TO MONTICELLO.

JUST A BIT OFF THE SCREEN HERE TO THE NORTH TOO.

SO KEEP THAT IN MIND AS WELL THAT THAT WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL PUBLIC STREET CONNECTION THAT WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE BASED ON CURRENT PLANS.

THE DENSITY OF THIS PARTICULAR COPPER CREEK PROJECT IS JUST UNDER 20 UNITS PER ACRE, COMING IN AT 19.54.

SO YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENT DENSITIES PROPOSED ON THE TABLE.

HERE. IT COMES UNDER THE ALLOWED DENSITY IN THE RP-3,4 AND 5 DISTRICTS.

SO IT MEETS CODE REQUIREMENTS WITH ZONING AND DENSITY.

AND I'LL ACTUALLY NOTE THAT THIS PROJECT HAS TWO LESS UNITS THAN THE CONCEPT PLAN, SO IT IS SLIGHTLY LESS DENSE.

I MENTIONED EARLIER COMPLETION OF WOODSONIA DRIVE.

SO HERE IS A GREAT GRAPHIC THAT SHOWS WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE.

SO THERE IS A SMALL SEGMENT OF WOODSONIA DRIVE THAT MUST BE COMPLETED.

WE HAVE THREE PROJECTS THAT ARE DEPENDENT ON THIS COMPLETION.

ONE FOR WESTSIDE FAMILY CHURCH, THEIR CARE CENTER BUILDING PROJECT.

IF YOU RECALL SEEING THAT LAST YEAR, AND THEN THE PROJECT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT NEXT ON THE AGENDA, THE RESIDENCES AT WOODSONIA UP HERE AND THIS PROJECT, WHOEVER COMES FIRST HAS TO BE THE COORDINATOR OF THAT PIECE BEING COMPLETED.

SO THAT WILL DEFINITELY BE COMPLETED BY SOMEONE, HOPEFULLY IN THE NEAR FUTURE HERE, BECAUSE WE'VE GOT ALL OF THESE PROJECTS LINED UP.

AND THEN TO THE SOUTH, AS WOODSONIA MEETS UP WITH PRAIRIE STAR PARKWAY ALL THE WAY SOUTH, THAT IS A REQUIREMENT IN ORDER FOR THIS PROJECT TO RECEIVE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

SO YOU CAN SEE THAT ALIGNMENT AS SHOWN ON CONCEPTUAL PLANS GOING SOUTH.

TIMELINE FOR THE ROAD.

SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO COMPLETE WOODSONIA BEFORE THEY CAN GET A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR APARTMENTS.

FOR ANY OF THOSE APARTMENTS RIGHT THERE.

[INAUDIBLE] THERE ARE A FEW DEVIATIONS REQUESTED WITH THIS PROJECT, AND I DO WANT TO NOTE AS WELL, DURING THE CONCEPT PLAN STAGE THERE WAS A DEVIATION THAT WAS APPROVED.

SO IT'S KIND OF A DEVIATION ON A DEVIATION IN A SENSE.

IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE THE K SEVEN HIGHWAY ENCROACHMENT PROPOSED.

THERE WAS A DEVIATION ALREADY APPROVED FOR 75FT INSTEAD OF 100FT FOR A SETBACK FROM K SEVEN.

IF YOU RECALL FROM SOME OTHER RECENT PROJECTS ALONG K TEN, THERE IS A 100 FOOT FREEWAY SPECIAL SETBACK REQUIREMENT.

AND THAT APPLIES TO K SEVEN AS WELL.

SO HERE YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS ENCROACH SLIGHTLY INTO THAT.

BUT THE THE MAJOR THING IN THIS CASE THAT THEY HAVE TO ASK FOR A NEW DEVIATION FOR IS THE PARKING AREA.

THE BUILDING ENCROACHMENT WAS ALREADY SHOWN ON THE CONCEPT PLANS AND APPROVED TO BE AT A 75 FOOT SETBACK.

[00:30:03]

SO REALLY THE NEWER DEVIATION IS FOR SOME OF THOSE PARKING AREAS TO ENCROACH BEYOND THAT 75FT.

SO IN THESE AREAS YOU CAN SEE HERE WITH SORT OF THE GRAY ARROWS POINTING.

I KNOW IT'S HARD TO SEE UNDER THE YELLOW LAYER HERE, BUT THERE'S A COUPLE AREAS WHERE JUST THE PARKING AND TURNAROUND AREA FOR THE PARKING ENCROACHES A LITTLE BIT DEEPER, AND THE APPLICANT WILL BE WORKING ON ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE BUFFERING TO BUFFER THAT PARKING FROM K SEVEN.

YOU CAN SEE HERE THE CLOSEST PARKING ENCROACHMENT IS A 48 FOOT SETBACK FROM THE HIGHWAY.

AND IN THIS CASE, AN 81FT SETBACK FOR THE BUILDING.

SO THE BUILDING IS NOT WITHIN THAT 75FT THAT WAS APPROVED ON THE CONCEPT PLAN.

THERE IS A REQUEST FOR A BUILDING HEIGHT DEVIATION FOR THE BUILDINGS YOU SEE OUTLINED IN THE PINK DIAGONAL FILLED AREAS HERE.

THE RP-5 DISTRICT ALLOWS 48FT.

THE RP-4 35FT AND THE RP-3 35FT.

SO YOU CAN SEE THAT DEVIATION JUST AFFECTS A COUPLE OF BUILDINGS HERE.

AND TO SHOW YOU THAT A LITTLE BIT BETTER, IT'S REALLY JUST A RESULT OF SOME ARCHITECTURAL INTEREST AND WANTING TO ADD A CUPOLA FEATURE ON THE BUILDING TO GIVE IT MORE INTEREST, A GABLE FEATURE IN THIS CASE, AND THE MAIN ROOF LINE IS UNDER THAT 35 FOOT REQUIREMENT.

SO THE MAJORITY OF THE BUILDING IS MEETING THAT AND IT'S REALLY JUST A RESULT OF ARCHITECTURAL INTEREST.

THE RP-5 BUILDINGS, AS YOU CAN SEE, I'LL START OVER HERE SAYING THAT, YOU KNOW, THE MAIN ROOF LINE IS MEETING THE 48 FOOT REQUIREMENT. AND THEN YOU JUST SEE SOME OF THESE GABLE FEATURES AND CUPOLA FEATURES EXTENDING IT BEYOND TO GIVE IT A LITTLE MORE INTEREST IN HEIGHT.

HERE ARE SOME BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR THE RP-3 AREA.

THE APPLICANT CAN POTENTIALLY TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THIS, BUT THESE ARE INTENDED TO BE SIMILAR MASSING AND SCALE TO A MANSION STYLE OR BIG HOUSE STYLE APARTMENT BUILDING.

THEY DO HAVE 12 UNITS IN THEM, BUT THEY'RE MEANT TO BE MORE SIMILAR IN FORM TO SOMETHING BETWEEN A TRADITIONAL APARTMENT BUILDING AND A SINGLE FAMILY HOME.

IT WOULD BE AN AWFULLY LARGE, LONG, SINGLE FAMILY HOME, WHICH IS WHY WE CALL IT BIG HOUSE OR MANSION STYLE FROM A FORM PERSPECTIVE.

BUT THE HEIGHT AND OVERALL MASSING IS MEANT TO TRANSITION BETWEEN SINGLE FAMILY TYPE CONSTRUCTION, LIKE YOU SEE IN WATERCRESS LANDING TOWARD THE RP-4, AND RP-5 THAT YOU SAW ON THE PREVIOUS SLIDE.

HERE ARE MORE BUILDING ELEVATIONS SO YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENCES IN THE PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO.

THEY WILL HAVE A DIFFERENT LOOK AND FEEL.

AND THE PHASE ONE IS GOING TO BE FOR THOSE THAT PREFER THE MODERN ARCHITECTURE AND A LITTLE BIT MORE TRADITIONAL, ALTHOUGH INCORPORATING A LOT OF THE SAME COLORS AND MATERIALS IN PHASE TWO.

AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE RP-5.

SO JUST SWITCHING BACK BETWEEN THOSE TWO YOU CAN SEE IT BASICALLY JUST GROWS A STORY.

I LIKE TO DO THAT BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE IT GIVES A GOOD COMPARISON TO SWITCH BACK AND FORTH.

SO THERE'S THE RP-5.

AND AGAIN THIS WOULD BE THE AREA THAT IS CLOSEST TO K SEVEN.

THE APPLICANT PROVIDED CITE SECTIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE DIFFERENT VANTAGE POINTS THROUGH THE SITE, AND BE ABLE TO SEE BOTH THE GRADING OF THE LAND, THE TOPOGRAPHY THERE IN RELATION TO WOODSONIA DRIVE, WHICH YOU CAN SEE RELATIVELY ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE SCREEN, AND EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY, THIS IS JUST DEPICTING LIKE A GENERAL TWO STORY ELEVATION HERE.

YOU CAN SEE AGAIN WITH THE RP-3 AREA.

IT'S IN THAT TWO STORY RANGE AND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE IT'S PRETTY FLAT.

AND SO THERE'S REALLY NOT GOING TO BE MUCH OF THIS THAT PROTRUDES OVER A TYPICAL TWO STORY ELEVATION ON THE OTHER SIDE.

THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SIDE SITE, EXCUSE ME, IS A LITTLE BIT HIGHER.

SO YOU CAN SEE THAT GRADE STARTS TO PICK UP EVER SO SLIGHTLY ABOVE THE GRADE ON THE OTHER SIDE.

AND THERE IS A LITTLE BIT MORE GRADE CHANGE AGAIN ON THAT SOUTH SIDE AS IT GETS CLOSER TO THE RIGHT OF WAY AT K SEVEN ON THE SIDE OF THE SCREEN HERE.

SO THAT GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF THE CROSS SECTION OF THE ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILDING HEIGHT.

WE CREATED THIS GRAPHIC TO SHOW AN OPEN SPACE DEVIATION.

[00:35:02]

THERE IS A DEVIATION REQUEST TO LESSEN THE OPEN SPACE BASED ON THE REQUIREMENT BY CODE.

AND HERE YOU CAN SEE THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE THAT'S PROVIDED ON THE SITE.

THIS IS BASICALLY TO SHOW COMPARATIVELY TO WHAT YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN HERE.

AND THIS IS HOW MUCH OVERALL CUMULATIVE OPEN SPACE PROVIDED.

AND THEY'RE REQUESTING A DEVIATION THAT BASICALLY AMOUNTS TO 60,000FT² OR SO.

AND COMPARATIVELY IT LOOKS ABOUT LIKE THIS COMPARED TO THAT LARGER BLOCK.

AND OPEN SPACE IS ALL OF THE LAWN AND LANDSCAPE AREAS, SIDEWALKS, SIDE AMENITIES, PATIO SPACES AND GAZEBOS, BASICALLY ANYTHING THAT ISN'T BUILDING DRIVE AISLES AND PARKING LOT.

AND IS THE DEVIATION JUST THE WAY THE PUZZLE WORKED OUT? YEAH, JUST BASED ON THE PARKING NEEDS AND THE LAYOUT OF THE SITE.

THERE WASN'T A WHOLE LOT MORE ROOM TO ADD OPEN SPACE AFTER ALL THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS WERE MET.

THANK YOU. AND WITH THAT, STAFF AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN SLASH PLAT FOR OAK IQ COPPER CREEK FOR THIS MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

AND AGAIN, WE WANT TO LET YOU KNOW WE'RE OPEN FOR QUESTIONS ON THIS.

AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION ON THIS ITEM.

QUESTIONS FOR STEPHANIE BEFORE WE MOVE ON TO THE APPLICANT.

YES, CHELSEA.

HI, STEPHANIE. THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION.

I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED ON WHERE THE MORE CONTEMPORARY BUILDINGS ARE SITTING.

ARE THEY SITTING IN THE MIDDLE OR IS THAT WHERE THE YELLOW IS? SO THE MORE CONTEMPORARY LOOK IS THE NORTH SIDE.

JUST THE NORTH SIDE.

BUT IS IT IN THE MIDDLE OR IS IT THE ENTIRE NORTH SIDE? THE WHOLE NORTH SIDE HAS THAT MORE CONTEMPORARY FEEL.

SO LET ME GO BACK TO SOME OF THESE.

SO THIS ONE WOULD BE ON THE NORTH SIDE WHEREAS THIS ONE'S ON THE SOUTH SIDE.

THIS SO LET ME LET ME GO BACK.

THIS IS THE FAR WEST OF THE NORTH SIDE, FAR WEST OF THE EAST OR THE SOUTH SIDE.

I'M GOING TO CONFUSE MYSELF HERE.

THIS IS THE MIDDLE OF THE NORTH SIDE AND THE MIDDLE OF THE SOUTH SIDE.

AND THEN THIS IS WHAT YOU'D SEE FROM WOODSONIA ON THE EAST SIDE, ON THE NORTH HALF, AND THEN ON THE SOUTH HALF.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

I'LL KEEP THAT SITE PLAN UP FOR YOU.

ANYBODY ELSE? BILL.

STEPHANIE. DID I UNDERSTAND YOU THAT WOODSONIA WOULD BE COMPLETE BEFORE PHASE ONE GOT OCCUPANCY PERMITS? YES. ALL THE WAY DOWN TO PRAIRIE STAR? YES. AND ALL THE WAY UP TO THE CHURCH? YES. AND IS THAT PART NORTH? IS THE PART UP TO THE CHURCH THAT'S DEPENDENT ON A COUPLE OF OTHER LANDOWNERS, RIGHT.

AND DOES HE? IF THAT'S CORRECT, DOES THE APPLICANT KNOW THAT? AND WORKING WITH THEM AND COORDINATING.

YES. SO IT'S PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.

AND THERE ARE THREE DIFFERENT PROJECTS, AS I MENTIONED, THAT ARE CONTINGENT ON GETTING OCCUPANCY FOR THAT PIECE TO BE COMPLETED.

SO AT THIS POINT, I BELIEVE SEVERAL LANDOWNERS ARE WORKING TOGETHER TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO WORK ON THAT COMPLETION AND PAY FOR THAT [INAUDIBLE] WOODSONIA AND I CAN LET THE APPLICANT TALK MORE ABOUT THAT IF YOU'D LIKE? BUT THAT IS A DEVELOPER EXPENSE AND DEVELOPER REQUIREMENT.

SO LIKE I MENTIONED, THE THREE PROJECTS, EITHER WHOEVER COMES FIRST EITHER GETS TO TAKE ON THAT LITTLE PIECE OF WOODSONIA, BETWEEN YOU KNOW, THIS AREA HERE NEXT TO THE CHURCH TO THE NORTH OF THIS PROJECT.

OR THERE'LL BE A COMBINATION AND SHARED COST.

THANK YOU.

WASN'T IT ALSO A REQUIREMENT THAT THAT LITTLE SECTION NEEDED TO BE BUILT OUT BEFORE THEY COULD DO CONSTRUCTION, SO THAT THE CONSTRUCTION TRUCKS WEREN'T COMING THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO START THOSE PHASES? I THINK WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THAT.

TIM, WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADDRESS THAT? YES. TIM GREEN, CITY ENGINEER.

PREVIOUSLY, WHEN THIS CAME IN FOR REZONING, WE HAD TALKED ABOUT DURING CONSTRUCTION, BLOCKING OFF SOME OF THE STREETS, LIKE 89TH STREET AND SOME OF THOSE TO KEEP TRAFFIC CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC OFF OF THOSE AND OUT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND KEEP IT ON WOODSONIA.

[00:40:03]

SO I WAS JUST BEING CLEAR THAT THAT LITTLE SECTION HAS GOT TO BE BUILT BEFORE THEY START CONSTRUCTING, OR THEY'VE GOT TO FIGURE OUT A DIFFERENT WAY IN.

IT'S GOT TO AT LEAST BE UNDER CONSTRUCTION, AND THEY HAVE TO HAVE ACCESS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC OF THE APARTMENTS TO BE ABLE TO USE THAT.

THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO KNOW. THANK YOU.

THAT'S CORRECT. SO, TIM, JUST TO CLARIFY IT COULD NOT NECESSARILY BE COMPLETED, BUT IT COULD JUST BE A ENOUGH OF A ROAD THAT THEY COULD USE IT FOR CONSTRUCTION.

THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. APPLICANT TEAM.

ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO ADD? HI THERE.

SO JUST HAVE OUR TEAM HERE.

SO ANY QUESTIONS IN PARTICULAR ON ANYTHING OR I DO HAVE ONE.

JUST IF YOU COULD REVIEW THE PURPOSE OF THE TWO DIFFERENT PHASES AND HOW LONG YOU EXPECT THE DURATION TO BE OF EACH.

YEAH. SO THE KIND OF THE IDEA WITH THE TWO DIFFERENT PHASES IS JUST THE SIZE OF THE PROJECT IS KIND OF CREATING TWO KIND OF SEPARATE APARTMENT COMPLEXES THAT ARE, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE SIDE BY SIDE, BUT, YOU KNOW, THE ONE HAS THE MORE MODERN AND THE OTHER ONE IS THE MORE CONTEMPORARY.

AND THEN THE IDEA KIND OF FROM A CONSTRUCTION STANDPOINT IS TO EVEN WITHIN THE PHASES TO KIND OF HAVE SMALLER PHASES WITHIN THAT. SO THE IDEA IS TO START CONSTRUCTION ON JUST ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE OF PHASE ONE.

SO START THAT, START BUILDING THAT OUT, AND THEN KIND OF MOVE TOWARDS THE NORTHWEST, WHICH WOULD BE THE RP-5, THEN MOVE OVER TO PHASE TWO.

AND THEN JUST KIND OF DO IT IN FOUR CHUNKS.

SO THAT'S KIND OF THE IDEA.

AND STARTING ALONG WOODSONIA, WE HAVE THE BIG HOUSES.

SO THAT KIND OF CREATES A BUFFER BETWEEN, YOU KNOW, THE SINGLE FAMILY AND THE DEVELOPMENT.

SO WE CAN START WITH THAT.

AND THERE'S ALSO THE CLUBHOUSE AND THE AMENITIES KIND OF ON THE FRONT SIDE THERE.

SO THAT WAY WE CAN KIND OF GET THAT ALL ESTABLISHED, GET THE BIG HOUSES THE AMENITIES, GET ALL THE STREETS IN AND EVERYTHING.

AND THEN THAT WAY THAT FRONT PART IS DONE, AND THEN WE CAN EVEN START LEASING THAT UP AND THEN START MOVING TOWARDS THE, YOU KNOW, THE BACK ALONG K SEVEN AND THEN JUST DO THE EXACT SAME THING ON PHASE TWO.

A YEAR FOR EACH PHASE SIX MONTHS.

WHAT DO YOU THINK? YEAH, I THINK YOU KNOW, THE WHOLE PROJECT, I THINK WE'RE LOOKING AT PROBABLY.

YEAH, AROUND 24 MONTHS, KIND OF ON THAT, THAT FIRST PHASE.

BUT THEN THAT SECOND PHASE THE GOAL WOULD BE TO START THAT, YOU KNOW, WE DON'T NECESSARILY NEED TO FINISH THE ENTIRE PHASE, BUT WE'LL JUST KIND OF STAGGER IT.

SO THAT FIRST, YOU KNOW, THE FIRST CHUNK OF PHASE ONE, PROBABLY ABOUT A, YOU KNOW, 15 MONTHS OR SO IS KIND OF OUR TIMELINE AND THEN MOVING ALONG TO THE BACK, YOU KNOW SIDE OF PHASE ONE, BUT THEN WE CAN GET STARTED ON PHASE TWO, KIND OF HAVE BOTH OF THOSE GOING AND THEN JUST KIND OF KEEP MOVING ALONG THROUGH ALL FOUR AND, AND GET THEM ALL. AND THEN WE CAN KIND OF BE LEASING YOU KNOW BEHIND AS WE'RE GETTING CO, KEEP THE BIG MESS AT THE BACK.

YEAH. THAT'S THE PLAN ALONG THE HIGHWAY.

YES. WE HAVEN'T SEEN YOU BEFORE.

WELCOME. YEAH. THANKS.

JUST SO THAT WE'RE CLEAR, YOU KNOW, WE JUST CLARIFIED THAT THE ROAD TO PRAIRIE STAR IS GOING TO NEED TO BE DONE BEFORE WE'RE GIVEN OUT COS, RIGHT? CORRECT. AND SO YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT LEASING BEFORE WE'RE ALL DONE WITH THE FIRST PHASE VERSUS THE SECOND PHASE.

I JUST WANTED TO KNOW WHAT THE TIMELINE YOU THOUGHT WOULD BE FOR THE ENTIRE ROAD.

IS THAT THE SAME 15 MONTH TIMELINE [INAUDIBLE].

YEAH. THE I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS HAVE AN EXACT TIMELINE ON THE ROAD, BUT.

YEAH DOUG PHELPS ENGINEERING.

WE DON'T HAVE AN EXACT TIMELINE ON THE ROAD YET, BUT, I MEAN, THE ROAD WILL TAKE THE BETTER PART OF A YEAR TO TO CONSTRUCT.

[INAUDIBLE] I ABSOLUTELY WE UNDERSTAND THAT WE HAVE TO HAVE THE ROAD COMPLETE BEFORE WE OCCUPY ANY UNITS.

OKAY. I WAS JUST TRYING TO GET THE TIMELINE TO MAKE SURE EVERYTHING WAS BALANCED THE WAY THAT IT SHOULD BE.

I APPRECIATE THAT, THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I DO SEE SOME NEIGHBORS THAT I RECOGNIZE.

WE DON'T REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ITEM, BUT IF ANYBODY HAS ANYTHING THEY'D LIKE TO ADD, HAPPY TO HEAR IT.

[INAUDIBLE] YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

[INAUDIBLE] DAVID BREWER, 8834 MCCOY STREET IN WATERCRESS LANDING.

[00:45:04]

WE'VE HAD SOME OBVIOUSLY HAD SOME CONVERSATIONS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AMONGST THE RESIDENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT NOW THAT IT'S COME CLOSER TO FRUITION, SHALL WE SAY. AND THERE ARE SOME CONSIDERATIONS AND CONCERNS THAT THE NEIGHBORS HAVE BROUGHT FORTH.

AND I GUESS I'VE BEEN ASKED TO SPEAK TO A FEW OF THOSE.

MOSTLY THEY DEAL WITH THE ELEMENTS OF TRYING TO INTEGRATE A HIGH DENSITY PROJECT ADJACENT TO A SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, AND THOSE CREATE SOME REAL UNIQUE CHALLENGES.

I GIVE CREDIT TO THE DESIGN TEAM AND THE CONSIDERATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN BROUGHT FORTH WITH THIS.

I THINK, IN TRYING TO TO BUILD A HIGH DENSITY PROJECT AND, AND HAVE IT NOT IMPACT THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREA IS A IS A CHALLENGE. OKAY.

SO A COUPLE OF THE THINGS THAT REALLY COME UP THAT WE HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT DENSITY BECAUSE WE'RE GOING FROM HIGH DENSITY TO, I GUESS IN, IN THE CITY'S DESCRIPTION, IT'S RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BASED ON A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

BUT WE LOOK AT THE RP-3, WE LOOK AT THAT TRANSITION, TRYING TO DO WELL INTEGRATED TRANSITIONS BETWEEN THE TWO DENSITIES.

WE HAVE 512 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDINGS IN THE RP-3.

WE THINK THAT MAYBE THERE SHOULD BE SOME CONSIDERATION FOR LOOKING AT LOWER DENSITY STRUCTURES, ALONG WOODSONIA.

THAT HELPS TO CREATE KIND OF THAT TRANSITION.

I KNOW THE TWO STORY AND WE'VE HEARD ABOUT THAT, DOES SOME OF THAT, BUT WE FEEL LIKE THERE COULD BE MORE TO INTEGRATE WITH THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN TERMS OF THE BUILDING TYPE OR CONSTRUCTION TYPE.

SO THAT WOULD BE ONE ELEMENT.

TRAFFIC. YOU KNOW, WE'VE HEARD ABOUT WOODSONIA.

I APPRECIATE THE DISCUSSION ON THAT.

THAT'S A BIG CONCERN OF OURS.

THERE IS STILL A CONSIDERATION WHERE THE APARTMENT COMPLEX CONNECTS TO 88TH STREET AND 87TH TERRACE.

AS IT WILL BE COMPLETED, THAT THOSE WILL STILL BE OPEN TRAFFIC WAYS, AND THEY'LL CREATE A HIGHER LEVEL OF TRAFFIC WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO DOES THAT CREATE SAFETY CONCERNS OR OTHER CONSIDERATIONS? WELL, THE NEIGHBORS HAVE A REAL CONCERN ABOUT THAT.

I THINK YOU'VE ANSWERED THE BIGGEST CONCERNS FROM TRAFFIC, WHICH IS MAKING SURE THE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC ISN'T COMING THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

THAT'S THE THAT'S THE BIGGEST CONCERN.

BUFFER, ANOTHER WAY TO DO A SOFTER TRANSITION, SHALL WE SAY, BETWEEN THE TWO DENSITIES MIGHT BE TO INCREASE THE BUFFER.

ONE WAY TO DO THAT IS THROUGH LANDSCAPE BUFFER.

THEY'VE PROPOSED AND MET THE CODE IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING TO DO.

BUT MAYBE A HIGHER DENSITY LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG WOODSONIA IN THAT RP-3 DISTRICT MIGHT HELP CREATE AND SOFTEN SOME OF THAT TRANSITION BETWEEN THE TWO NEIGHBORHOODS.

AND THEN LAST, WE'RE ASSUMING THAT THEY'RE GOING TO SUBMIT A PETITION FOR A SPECIAL BENEFIT DISTRICT, OR I WOULD ASSUME THEY WOULD, TO TRY TO CONSTRUCT WOODSONIA.

AND SO IF THAT DOES OCCUR WE HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT WATERCRESS LANDING WOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THAT BENEFIT DISTRICT AND WHETHER OR NOT THAT MIGHT IMPACT THROUGH TAX ASSESSMENTS AND STUFF, OUR PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENTS THAT WE SEE WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO ANYWAY, THOSE ARE OUR CONCERNS OR CONSIDERATIONS.

THANK YOU, MAYOR, AND THANK YOU, COUNCIL, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.

OF COURSE. WE PROBABLY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THAT FINAL QUESTION THIS EVENING BECAUSE NOTHING OF THAT NATURE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED THAT WE KNOW OF.

MAYOR, I CAN JUST SAY THAT WE HAVE HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH DEVELOPERS OF ALL THE PROJECTS THAT ARE IMPACTED BY THIS, THIS ROADWAY ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF A SPECIAL BENEFIT DISTRICT.

WE'VE BEEN EXCHANGING INFORMATION.

WE DON'T HAVE A POSITION FORMALLY ON THAT YET.

BUT I WILL SAY THAT NO NO TIME AT ANY TIME DURING THESE CONVERSATIONS, HAVE THE EXISTING RESIDENCES WITHIN THE WATERCRESS LANDING BEEN CONSIDERED FOR PART OF THAT AT ALL.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

THE OTHER QUESTION REGARDING THE STEPPING OF THE DENSITY, I FEEL LIKE WE KNOCKED AROUND THAT TOPIC ABOUT AS WELL AS WE COULD HAVE WHEN WE FIRST CONSIDERED THIS REMANDED TO PLANNING COMMISSION AT ONE POINT TO GET ANOTHER ANSWER ON THAT.

SO WE PROBABLY ARE WHERE WE ARE AS FAR AS WHERE WE CAN BE FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAN.

AS FAR AS HAVING THAT RP-3, RP-4, RP-5 STRATEGY IN PLACE.

BUT THANK YOU FOR THAT INPUT.

MOVE TO COUNCIL MEMBER QUESTIONS COMMENTARY BEFORE WE FINALIZE.

GO AHEAD. I WOULD JUST ECHO A LOT OF WHAT THE MAYOR SAID.

[00:50:02]

WE. WE TALKED ABOUT THE ZONING.

I DIDN'T REALIZE IT WAS THREE YEARS AGO ALREADY, IT SEEMS SEEMS MORE RECENT THAN THAT.

BUT WE TALKED A LOT ABOUT THAT.

AND THERE I THINK THEY'RE PLAYING HERE MEETS THE, THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING.

SO THERE'S ONLY SO MUCH WE CAN DO.

AND I THINK THEY'VE DONE A NICE JOB OF MEETING THOSE REQUIREMENTS AND TRYING TO ADDRESS THEM.

I THINK FROM A TRAFFIC PERSPECTIVE, I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN WE HAVE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

WE HAVE AN APARTMENT DIRECTLY ACROSS.

BEFORE THAT WAS BUILT, WE HAD A LOT OF CONCERN ABOUT CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC.

THERE IS ALMOST NONE.

RENTER HAS BECOME THE WAY IN AND OUT FOR THE APARTMENT DWELLERS.

I THINK WOODSONIA WILL AS WELL.

SURE THERE WILL BE SOME TRAFFIC FROM THE APARTMENTS TO THE PARK, BUT I THINK THE VAST MAJORITY WILL WILL TAKE WOODSONIA.

AND I THINK THE, THE ONE STREET I THINK IS 89TH STREET THAT WAS MOVED SO THAT THAT COULD NOT BECOME AN EASY CUT THROUGH.

I LIKE THAT AS WELL.

SO I'M SUPPORTIVE OF THE PLAN.

ANYBODY ELSE? QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? BILL.

THANK YOU MAYOR.

YEAH, WE DID TALK ABOUT THIS A LOT THREE YEARS AGO.

AND I STILL THINK IT'S TOO DENSE.

WE HAD QUITE A BIT OF CONVERSATION ABOUT IT.

I STILL THINK IT'S TOO DENSE, AND I DON'T PLAN TO SUPPORT IT.

FOR OUR NEW MEMBERS WHO WEREN'T PRESENT IN 2021, WE CLEAR ON EVERYTHING HOW THAT ALL WORKS.

I HAVE A QUESTION. YES, PLEASE.

SO SO THE PIECE UP NORTH, THE THE ROAD THAT HAS TO BE BUILT SAY THREE LANDOWNERS HAVE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS, OR CAN THEY JUST DO IT THEMSELVES? AND DO THEY HAVE THE FINANCIAL MEANS TO DO IT SO THEY CAN COMPLETE THEIR PROJECT? SO JUST TO CLARIFY THIS LITTLE PIECE UP HERE, THERE ARE THREE DIFFERENT PROJECTS THAT ARE EITHER RECENTLY APPROVED OR IN THE PIPELINE, IN FACT, TONIGHT THAT DEPEND ON THIS BEING COMPLETED IN ORDER TO EITHER GET TO THEIR PROJECT FOR CONSTRUCTION OR OCCUPY THEIR SPACE AND GET A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

SO IT WILL BE FULLY DEDICATED RIGHT OF WAY.

AND A I THINK A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PERMIT IS ALREADY IN FOR THAT PIECE OF ROADWAY.

SO AT THIS POINT, I BELIEVE IT'S JUST WHOEVER WANTS TO DO IT FIRST.

BUT I THINK THERE IS SOME AS BECKY MENTIONED, THERE IS SOME COLLABORATION OCCURRING ON, YOU KNOW, WHETHER THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME PARTNERSHIP ON THE ROAD COST BOTH FOR THAT PIECE AND FURTHER TO THE SOUTH.

ANYBODY ELSE? MARK, PLEASE.

I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS FOR YOU, STEPHANIE, OR THE OWNERSHIP TEAM AND THE DESIGN TEAM.

THE REQUEST FOR THE OPEN SPACE DEVIATION.

YOU HAD MENTIONED THAT IT YOU KNOW, BASED ON, YOU KNOW, THE UNITS FOR THE DENSITY IS OBVIOUSLY MET THAT THEY'VE MET THE DENSITY, BUT THEY HAVEN'T MET THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT.

AND SO, YOU KNOW, HOW IS THAT JUDGED IN REGARDS TO, YOU KNOW, PUTTING IN LESS DENSE, YOU KNOW, LESS UNITS TO ALLOW YOU TO GET MORE OF THE OPEN SPACE TO MEET THAT REQUIREMENT.

THAT DEVIATION IS KIND OF WHAT'S BUGGING ME.

YES. SO MORE SPECIFICALLY, IN OUR PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT, WE TALKED ABOUT THIS REQUEST BEING A 22% REDUCTION TO THE REQUIRED 60% OF OPEN SPACE.

AND BASICALLY, IT'S NOT BASED ON DENSITY, IT'S BASED ON THE ZONING.

SO FOR EXAMPLE, RP-4 REQUIRES 60% OF OPEN SPACE, RP-3 REQUIRES 60% OF OPEN SPACE, AND R P-5 REQUIRES 40% OF THAT AREA TO BE OPEN SPACE. SO IT'S BASED ON ZONING, NOT NECESSARILY THE NUMBER OF UNITS.

SO GETTING RID OF A FEW UNITS DOESN'T CHANGE THAT THEY STILL HAVE TO HAVE 40% OR 60% OF THAT ZONING AREA AS OPEN SPACE.

SO BECAUSE OF THE UNIQUE LAYOUT WHERE THEY'VE TIERED THREE DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICTS AND THEY'RE DOING TWO DIFFERENT PHASES AS WELL, IT MADE FOR A FUN MATH EQUATION FOR ALL OF US, BOTH STAFF AND THE APPLICANT.

I THINK TO FIGURE OUT THE OPEN SPACE AND EXACTLY WHAT THAT DEVIATION LOOKED LIKE.

STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THIS BECAUSE THE CUMULATIVE REDUCTION WHILE IT'S 22% IN RP-4 AND I THINK THE OTHER ZONING DISTRICTS, IT'S LET'S SEE 10% IN RP-3, AND THEN RP-5 ACTUALLY HAS 56% OPEN SPACE, WHERE 40% IS THE REQUIREMENT. SO CUMULATIVELY WE'RE LOOKING AT MORE LIKE 5% OF THE OVERALL AREA, WHICH IS WHAT YOU SEE DEPICTED, I GUESS, ON

[00:55:10]

THE SCREEN FOR YOU GUYS IN THAT GREEN BOX.

SO IT'S HARD TO LOOK AT BECAUSE OF THE WAY THAT THE SITE IS SET UP WITH THE DIFFERENT ZONING AND THE DIFFERENT PHASING.

BUT WE TRY TO DEMONSTRATE THAT JUST IN A VISUAL MANNER, WITH THE GREEN BOXES SHOWING YOU WHAT'S BEING PROVIDED AND WHAT'S BEING DEVIATED.

SO I HOPE THAT THAT GIVES YOU A LITTLE BIT MORE EXPLANATION AND ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION.

BUT OVERALL WHEN WE WORK ON THE FINAL PLAN, IF THIS IF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN IS APPROVED THIS EVENING OR AT SOME OTHER POINT IN THE FUTURE, WE DO INTEND ON MAKING SURE THAT THAT OPEN SPACE IS APPROPRIATELY COMPENSATED WITH EITHER ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING OR MAYBE SOME ENHANCED ARCHITECTURE AMENITIES. WE USUALLY TRY AND OFFSET THOSE THINGS.

SO MAYBE IF THERE'S FIVE LESS FEET OF GREEN SPACE SOMEWHERE, CAN THEY ADD FOUR MORE SHRUBS INTO IT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

SO THERE'S USUALLY A GIVE AND TAKE.

AND THAT'S A DETAIL THAT WE FINALIZE AT A FINAL PLAN STAGE.

AND WE JUST KIND OF CONCEPTUALIZE AT THE PRELIMINARY STAGE SPACE PLAN PROBLEM.

YEAH. COURTNEY.

SURE. I THINK OUR APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO THAT AS WELL, IF THAT'S OKAY.

GO AHEAD. HI.

BRAD HUGHES WITH NSPJ ARCHITECTS.

WE ARE AT 3515 WEST 75TH STREET.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE ONE QUICK POINT OF CLARIFICATION.

WITH THE OPEN SPACE.

STEPHANIE'S DONE A NICE JOB OF ILLUSTRATING IT, BUT FOR A LITTLE BIT MORE CLARITY, THE RP-3 AND THE RP-5 BOTH EXCEED THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, AND ALL THE DEFICIENCY IS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SITE AND THE RP-4.

SO IT IS CONTAINED TOWARDS THE CENTER OF THE SITE WHERE WE HAVE A LESSER AMOUNT.

AND AGAIN THAT IS PRIMARILY DUE TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS.

WE MEET OUR WE MEET OR EXCEED THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ON THE EAST SIDE ALONG WOODSONIA.

WE DO HAVE THE REDUCTION ON THE WEST SIDE.

SO WE'VE KIND OF TRIED TO SHIFT THE WHOLE SITE FURTHER AWAY AS WELL.

BUT THEN WHEN YOU ADD IN WHAT'S REQUIRED FOR EVEN FIRE CODE WITH LANE WIDTHS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, THE AMOUNT OF PARKING THAT'S NEEDED AND ALL THIS STUFF KIND OF ACCUMULATES.

AND THAT'S WHAT CAUSED KIND OF THAT REDUCTION IN THE OPEN SPACE.

BUT AGAIN, IT IS CONSOLIDATED TOWARDS THE MIDDLE OF THE SITE.

AND IT WAS A VERY CONSCIENTIOUS EFFORT TO DO THAT.

MAKES SENSE. SO COURT.

OKAY. AS I LOOK AT THIS PLAN, I FEEL LIKE IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY DONE.

I, TOO BELIEVE THAT THIS WAS PRETTY DENSE FOR THIS AREA.

BUT THIS IS WHERE WE'RE AT AND IT MEETS THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS.

SO THAT BEING SAID, I WONDER I APPRECIATED THE THE CLARIFICATION ON THE ROAD BEING BUILT OUT.

THAT WAS A GENUINE CONCERN THAT WE HASHED OUT LAST.

TIME. AND I ALSO WANTED TO ASK IF THERE BECAUSE THE NEIGHBORS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.

IS THERE A STIPULATION THAT COULD POSSIBLY BE MADE TO ADDING MORE [INAUDIBLE] AS A DEVIATION, OR AS A STIPULATION TO THE DEVIATION FOR THE OPEN SPACE, LIKE JUST TO? IS THERE ROOM FOR THAT? I GUESS IS WHAT I'M ASKING, OR WHAT THAT COULD LOOK LIKE? OR IS THAT SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE FOR THE FINAL PLAN AS WELL.

SO I MEAN, THAT COULD EITHER BE ADDED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THIS EVENING.

OBVIOUSLY THE COUNCIL IS ABLE TO ADD ANY CONDITIONS, AND I THINK IF NOT A FORMAL CONDITION, THAT'S SOMETHING I COULD RELAY BACK TO OUR STAFF AS WE REVIEW A FINAL PLAN.

AND OBVIOUSLY THE APPLICANT AND THEIR TEAM IS HERE THIS EVENING TO HEAR THAT CONCERN AS WELL.

THE OTHER CONCERN THAT I HAVE IS SIMILAR TO THE ONE THAT WE TALKED ABOUT WITH THE ITEM THAT'S COMING UP NEXT, IS THAT THERE IS WE REQUESTED WITH THAT PARTICULAR ITEM, A SPECIFIC WRITER IN THE LEASE TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPLICANTS OR THE THE PEOPLE THAT ARE THE TENANTS THAT WILL BE MOVING IN TO THOSE APARTMENTS, KNOW THAT THEY ARE MOVING IN NEXT TO AN OUTDOOR SHOOTING RANGE AND THAT IT BE SOMETHING THAT THEY SIGN IN THEIR LEASE, THAT THEY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS IS HAPPENING.

JUST SO THAT EVERYONE IS AWARE AND WE DON'T END UP WITH LOTS OF CALLS ABOUT THERE BEING AN OUTDOOR SHOOTING RANGE.

YOU KNOW, WHEN THE [INAUDIBLE] AND THAT THAT'S PART OF WHAT WHERE THEY'RE MOVING TO.

AND I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU ALL FEEL ABOUT THAT, BUT I WANTED TO EXPRESS MY CONCERNS ABOUT THAT AS WELL.

I WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF SUPPORTING THIS IF WE COULD MAKE SOME STIPULATIONS FOR ADDING SOME BUFFER TO SOME MORE LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO WOODSONIA.

[01:00:04]

AND ALONG WITH ALL OF THE ROAD COMPLETIONS THAT WE ALREADY HAD IN PLACE PRIOR.

AND WOULD REQUEST THAT THE WHEN PEOPLE START TO OCCUPY THESE, THAT THEY ARE FULLY AWARE ON THE FRONT END THAT THEY'RE MOVING IN NEXT DOOR TO POWDER CREEK.

STEPHANIE, CAN YOU HELP US ON HOW WE WOULD ADD A STIPULATION TO THE APPROVAL THIS EVENING? WHAT WOULD WE SAY ABOUT MORE LANDSCAPING? WE CAN'T JUST SAY MORE.

SURE. I WOULD SAY THAT YOU COULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH THE CONDITION THAT A THERE IS SOMETHING ADDED TO THE LEASE THAT INFORMS FUTURE RESIDENTS OF THE POWDER CREEK SHOOTING RANGE NEARBY, AND B THAT ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING IS PROVIDED IN THE RP-3 AREA NEAREST WOODSONIA TO PROVIDE A BUFFER.

BUT WE DON'T NEED TO QUANTIFY THAT.

I DON'T THINK YOU REALLY CAN AT THIS POINT.

I DON'T THINK IT WOULD DO ANY JUSTICE TO SAY 10 MORE TREES AND 80 MORE SHRUBS, BECAUSE THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I HEAR LOUD AND CLEAR AS A DIRECTIVE, AND I CAN MAKE SURE OUR TEAM IS REVIEWING THAT APPROPRIATELY AT FINAL PLAN STAGE.

THERE WILL BE A LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH THE FINAL PLAN, CORRECT? CORRECT. SO COULD WE AT THAT TIME MAKE REVISIONS IF WE DIDN'T FEEL LIKE THERE WAS ENOUGH? CORRECT. USUALLY THE FINAL PLAN WOULD NOT COME BEFORE THE COUNCIL, THOUGH.

IT WOULD JUST GO TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

BUT IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU DID WANT TO CALL UP FROM PLANNING COMMISSION, WE COULD CERTAINLY BRING THAT TO A COUNCIL AGENDA.

OKAY [INAUDIBLE].

MAYOR, DO WE HAVE TO VOTE ON THAT STIPULATION? I THINK WE'RE GOING TO VOTE TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAN WITH THE STIPULATION.

AND IF YOU'D LIKE TO VOTE NO, YOU CAN.

WHAT ABOUT THOSE OF US THAT DON'T WANT THAT STIPULATION ON IT? [INAUDIBLE] NO, I YOU WOULD JUST VOTE NO ON THE MOTION. YOU'RE GOING TO VOTE NO ON EVERY MOTION AT HAND.

AND PARDON ME, IF THE VOTE YOU'RE GOING TO VOTE NO OR YOU'RE GOING TO VOTE ON THE MOTION AT HAND.

IF THE MOTION HAS THE STIPULATIONS, YOU'LL HAVE TO VOTE HOW YOU FEEL ON THOSE STIPULATIONS.

WE'RE NOT GOING TO VOTE INDIVIDUALLY ON EACH STIPULATION.

SO JUST BE CLEAR.

ANY OF US COULD PUT UP A STIPULATION ANY TIME ON ANY PLAN, AND WE ALL THEN VOTE ON THE TOTALITY OF THE PLAN WITH THAT STIPULATION THAT REALLY HASN'T RUN THROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION [INAUDIBLE].

I WOULDN'T EXPECT US TO, BUT IT SEEMS LIKE WE HAVE THAT PERMISSION TO DO THAT.

I THINK THAT THE ISSUE IS WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT WHETHER IT'S A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE TO WHAT WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR NOT, WHETHER SOMETHING IS A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE AT THAT POINT, I THINK THAT PROBABLY SCOTT OR SEAN OR I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT SOMETHING THAT IS SIGNIFICANT SHOULD PERHAPS BE REMANDED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEM TO CONSIDER.

IN THIS INSTANCE, WHERE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE ADDITION OF LANDSCAPING IN ONE AREA OF THIS LARGE PLAN AND A ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF A OF A SHOOTING RANGE, I DON'T VIEW THAT AS SIGNIFICANT.

SEAN AND I HAVE BEEN SHARING COMMENTS WITH EACH OTHER AT THIS POINT ABOUT THAT, AND I DON'T BELIEVE WE THINK THOSE ARE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES.

AND SO WE'RE NOT RECOMMENDING THAT IT GO BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION.

IF YOU WERE SAYING, YOU KNOW, WITH THE STIPULATION THAT YOU CUT THE NUMBER OF UNITS IN HALF, THAT'S SIGNIFICANT.

WE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THAT NOT BE VOTED ON TONIGHT, BUT THAT IT BE SENT BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

THESE ARE MINOR TWEAKS.

AND AS ANY TIME A MOTION IS MADE WITH STIPULATIONS OR WITHOUT, YOU HAVE TO DECIDE HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THAT IN TOTALITY AND VOTE YES OR NO.

AND IF THE MOTION IS MADE WITH STIPULATIONS AND THAT FAILS, ANOTHER MOTION CAN BE MADE WITHOUT STIPULATIONS OR WITH DIFFERENT STIPULATIONS.

THAT'S JUST SORT OF HOW THE MOTION PRACTICE WORKS IN GENERAL.

UNDERSTOOD. OKAY.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU SEAN.

COURTNEY, ARE YOU MAKING THE MOTION TO APPROVE WITH STIPULATIONS.

I MOVE THAT WE MOVE FOR APPROVAL WITH THE STIPULATIONS OF A AND B, AS STATED BY STEPHANIE, WITH THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF POWDER CREEK AND THE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING BUFFER.

CAN I GET A SECOND FOR THAT MOTION?

[01:05:01]

SECOND. MOTION SECOND BY CRAIG.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? NO. THANK YOU.

MOTION IS APPROVED.

[14. Consideration of a rezoning and preliminary plan/plat known as The Residences on Woodsonia for a multifamily residential development located near the northeast and southeast corners of future 86th Street & Woodsonia Drive]

ITEM NUMBER 14.

THANK YOU ALL.

ITEM NUMBER 14 IS A CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAN, KNOWN AS THE RESIDENCES ON WOODSONIA FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHEAST CORNER AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF FUTURE 86TH STREET AND WOODSONIA DRIVE.

ITEM 14 A IS AN IS AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PROPERTY FROM AG AGRICULTURAL TO RP-4 AND RP-2.

ITEM 14 B IS APPROVAL OF A COMPANION PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THE RESIDENCES OF WOODSONIA, STEPHANIE.

THANK YOU AGAIN MAYOR AND COUNCIL STEPHANIE KISLER WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.

AND AS MENTIONED FOR THE LAST TIME THIS EVENING, I'M IN FRONT OF YOU TO PRESENT A REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE RESIDENCES ON WOODSONIA.

AND THIS IS GOING TO LOOK VERY FAMILIAR.

IT'S JUST NORTH OF OUR LAST PROJECT AT ABOUT 86 AND WOODSONIA BETWEEN WOODSONIA AND MONTICELLO.

SO JUST TO ORIENT YOU HERE, WE'RE MOVING A LITTLE BIT TO THE NORTHEAST.

THAT COPPER CREEK PROJECT IS RIGHT HERE ON THE SCREEN WHERE MY MOUSE IS AT.